Sevier Juvenile Law Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

William Melton
About | Practice Areas
Melton Law
5955 South Redwood Road Suite 103 Taylorsville, UT 84123» view map
Criminal Defense and Accident & Injury
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On

Melton Law is dedicated to providing competent and great representation to our clients. We will be there to help you and answer any questions you have every step of the way.

800-952-9770
1. William Melton Taylorsville, UT
  Attorney at Law- UT, 2019
  University of Idaho College of Law, J.D. 2019
2. AboutMelton Law
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Sevier Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Sevier lawyers.

Murray Herbert Falk

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

475 E 100 N, Monroe, UT 84754

Michael C Mathie

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

45 South 200 East, Monroe, UT 84754

Jeffery P Gleave

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

205 Mountain View Ln, Monroe, UT 84754

Michael R Labrum

Family Law, Criminal, Contract, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

30 E 200 N, Richfield, UT 84701

Mark K Mciff

Real Estate, Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

250 North Main Street, Richfield, UT 84701

Kay L Mciff

Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Government, Civil & Human Rights

Status: Deceased Licensed: 57 Years

CONTACT

225 North 100 East, Richfield, UT 84701

Richard K Chamberlain

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

225 N 100 E, Richfield, UT 84701

Todd Macfarlane

General Practice

Status: Suspended Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

Kanosh, UT 84637

Marcus Taylor

Government, Environmental Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

635 N Main St, Richfield, UT 84701

Mandy S Larsen

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

895 E 300 N, Richfield, UT 84701

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

STATE EX REL. KF

... meaningful appellate review. I. THE JUVENILE COURT HAD SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. ... A. There Was Sufficient Evidence for the Juvenile Court to Determine That the Mother Failed to Comply With Her Service Plan. Â¶ 45 At the ...

Whitney v. DIV. OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SERV.

Â¶ 4 At the hearing, the juvenile court directed Juvenile Services to perform an observation and assessment of Dillon. The juvenile court later ordered Juvenile Services to transfer Dillon to a community-based placement. Juvenile Services placed Dillon in the community-based ...

STATE EX REL. ACM

... II. THE JUVENILE COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE PETITION TO TERMINATE MR. NUOSCI'S PARENTAL RIGHTS. ... IV. THE JUVENILE COURT STATED LEGALLY SUFFICIENT GROUNDS TO TERMINATE MR. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Sevier Juvenile Law Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Melton Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Murray Herbert Falk

Michael C Mathie

Jeffery P Gleave

Michael R Labrum

Mark K Mciff

Kay L Mciff

Richard K Chamberlain

Todd Macfarlane

Marcus Taylor

Mandy S Larsen

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JUSTICE SYSTEM

ACTUS REUS

DIRECTED VERDICT

BURDEN OF PROOF

ARREST WARRANT

MENS REA

SELF-INCRIMINATION

EAVESDROPPING

INDECENT EXPOSURE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

STATE EX REL. KF

Whitney v. DIV. OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SERV.

STATE EX REL. ACM

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details