Shaw Island Juvenile Law Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Newcombe
About Us | Services
The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe
Proudly Serving The Greater Puget Sound RegionÂ» view map
Criminal Defense, DWI/DUI, Misdemeanor
CONTACT US FOR A CONSULTATION

Our Washington State lawyers have the resources, the knowledge, and the experience to assist you with your legal matter in our practice areas.

800-699-2370
1. Jason Newcombe Seattle, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 1999
  Boston College Law School, J.D. - 1997
2. About UsServing Washington
  Offices in Seattle, Bellevue, Tacoma, Everett, and Olympia
3. ServicesExperienced Attorneys
  We always offer a free initial consultation and case evaluation
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Barbara W Sharp

Litigation, Juvenile Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

3273 Pear Point Rd, Friday Harbor, WA 98250

Carolyn Louise Deroos

Landlord-Tenant, Elder Law, Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

Friday Harbor, WA 98250

Paula M. Plumer

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Criminal, Indians & Native Populations

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

Anacortes, WA 98221

Rebecca Kathleen Carroll

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Anacortes, WA 98221

Jon Elliot Ostlund

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal, Constitutional Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

3161 Biz Point Rd, Anacortes, WA 98221

Trena Berton

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

Oak Harbor, WA 98277

Margaret Mary Mawson

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Guardianships & Conservatorships

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

Bellingham, WA 98228

Penny Rose Henderson

Juvenile Law, Federal, Estate Planning, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

Bellingham, WA 98229

Julie M. Levitt-Guren

Juvenile Law, Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

Bellingham, WA 98227

Julie M. Levitt-Guren

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

Bellingham, WA 98227

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BAILOR

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in or... (more...)

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in order to get it fixed would be a bailor.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Chavez

... C. JOHNSON, J. Â¶ 1 This case asks us to determine whether a juvenile charged with a ... As a result, two psychological experts were appointed, one for the State and one for the defense, and both opined that Chavez would be better served if he remained in the juvenile system. ...

State v. Torngren

... Mr. Torngren and the State disagreed on the proper offender scores for his sentence. Mr. Torngren's criminal history consisted of 12 prior offenses. It included two juvenile adjudications from 1994 for third degree assault and attempted second degree robbery. ...

State v. MC

... Another statute provides that a victim penalty assessment shall be imposed when "any juvenile is adjudicated of any offense in any juvenile offense disposition under Title 13 RCW." RCW 7.68.035(1)(b). Because a deferred disposition is not a "juvenile offense disposition," the ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Shaw Island Juvenile Law Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Barbara W Sharp

Carolyn Louise Deroos

Paula M. Plumer

Rebecca Kathleen Carroll

Jon Elliot Ostlund

Trena Berton

Margaret Mary Mawson

Penny Rose Henderson

Julie M. Levitt-Guren

Julie M. Levitt-Guren

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BAILOR

NOLO CONTENDERE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

INDECENT EXPOSURE

SPECIFIC INTENT

NOLLE PROSEQUI

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

LINEUP

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Chavez

State v. Torngren

State v. MC

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details