Silverton Juvenile Law Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Oliveros
About | Practice Areas
Oliveros Law Group, P.C.
9200 S.E. Sunnybrook Boulevard Suite 335 Clackamas, OR 97015» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
007 Law

At Oliveros Law Group P.C, our attorneys help clients understand their rights when they have been injured due to the deliberate or careless act of another person.

800-797-7891
1. Gregory Oliveros Clackamas, OR
  Attorney at Law - OR, 1990
  Lewis & Clark Law School J.D. 1990
2. AboutOliveros Law Group, P.C.
  007 Law
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Shelley L. Fuller

Mass Torts, Family Law, Adoption, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

6700 S.W. 105th Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97008

Priscilla L. Seaborg

US Courts, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1906 S.W. Madison St., Portland, OR 97205

Pamela L Abernethy

Juvenile Law, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

333 High St Ne, Salem, OR 97301

Arthur P Slininger

Criminal, Juvenile Law, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

549 Nw 2Nd Ave, Canby, OR 97013

Tracy L. Gregg

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Guardianships & Conservatorships, Adoption

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

2659 Commercial St Se, Salem, OR 97308

Matthew Brady Duckworth

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

802 Main St, Oregon City, OR 97045

Matthew B Duckworth

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

802 Main St, Oregon City, OR 97045

James Keddis

Family Law, Foreclosure, Employment, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

2875 Marylhurst Drive, West Linn, OR 97068

April Boutillette Brinkman

Administrative Law, Civil Rights, Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: Suspended

CONTACT

8539 N Lombard St, Happy Valley, OR 97203

John Forczak

Juvenile Law, Divorce & Family Law, Children's Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

Portland, OR 97281

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

STATE EX REL. JUVENILE DEPT. OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY v. JLM

190 P.3d 379 (2008). 345 Or. 158. STATE EX REL. JUVENILE DEPT. OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY v. JLM. No. (S056088). Supreme Court of Oregon. July 23, 2008. Petition for review denied.

STATE EX REL. JUVENILE DEPT. OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY v. FW

189 P.3d 25 (2008). 344 Or. 670. STATE EX REL. JUVENILE DEPT. OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY v. FW. No. (S055968). Supreme Court of Oregon. June 18, 2008. Petition for review denied.

Dept. of Human Services v. CZ

... SERCOMBE, J. In this juvenile dependency case, the state alleged that mother's use of marijuana presented a reasonable likelihood of harm to her two children, and the juvenile court took jurisdiction over both children as to mother on that basis. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Silverton Juvenile Law Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

Oliveros Law Group, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Shelley L. Fuller

Priscilla L. Seaborg

Pamela L Abernethy

Arthur P Slininger

Tracy L. Gregg

Matthew Brady Duckworth

Matthew B Duckworth

James Keddis

April Boutillette Brinkman

John Forczak

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

BURDEN OF PROOF

MCNAGHTEN RULE

HUNG JURY

INFRACTION

SENTENCE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

ACTUS REUS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

STATE EX REL. JUVENILE DEPT. OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY v. JLM

STATE EX REL. JUVENILE DEPT. OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY v. FW

Dept. of Human Services v. CZ

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details