Starke Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Adrian Middleton
About | Practice Areas
Sword & Shield, P.A.
1437 Market St Tallahassee, FL 32312» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Legal Representation You Can Trust

Our team of attorneys has the experience and creativity that will provide you with an outcome that will not hurt your rights or your future.

800-978-7301
1. Adrian Middleton Tallahassee, FL
  Attorney at Law- FL, 2012
  Florida State University College of Law, J.D. 2012
2. AboutSword & Shield, P.A.
  Legal Representation You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Divorce & Family
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Charles Daniel Sikes

Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

817 Mcmahon St, Starke, FL 32091

Christopher W Adamec

Real Estate, Trusts, Personal Injury, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

100 W Call St, Starke, FL 32091

Curtis Alexis Sanders

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

Starke, FL 32091

David Paul Salter

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

Starke, FL 32091

Eddie Lee Edwards

Criminal, Merger & Acquisition

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Starke, FL 32091

James Reginald Flynn

Civil Rights, Workers' Compensation, Medical Malpractice, Criminal, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

407 Georgia St, Starke, FL 32091

Luis Enrique Bustamante

Lawsuit & Dispute, Intellectual Property, Criminal, Consumer Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

945 N Temple Ave, Starke, FL 32091

Mark J Dobo

Traffic, Criminal, Insurance, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

945 N Temple Ave, Starke, FL 32091

Susan Anderson Ward

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Starke, FL 32091

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Starke Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

Sword & Shield, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Charles Daniel Sikes

Christopher W Adamec

Curtis Alexis Sanders

David Paul Salter

Eddie Lee Edwards

James Reginald Flynn

Luis Enrique Bustamante

Mark J Dobo

Susan Anderson Ward

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

LARCENY

ACQUITTAL

DIRECTED VERDICT

CAPITAL CASE

JUSTICE SYSTEM

SELF-INCRIMINATION

INFORMED CONSENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

State v. Meshell

Jackson v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details