Sugartown RICO Act Lawyer, Louisiana

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Sugartown RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Sugartown Criminal lawyers.

Wesley Ryan Bailey

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Real Estate, Wills & Probate, Adoption

Wesley Bailey is a practicing lawyer in the state of Louisiana specializing in Divorce & Family Law. More about Wes Bailey: Managing Attorney for so... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

337-404-7716

303 E Texas St, Leesville, LA 71446

George Higgins

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Accident & Injury

George Lewis Higgins III received his Juris Doctor degree in 1979 from Paul M. Hebert Law Center at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. Mr. Hig... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-967-0511

P.O. Box 3373, Pineville, LA 71361

Leslie R Leavoy

Lawsuit & Dispute, Adoption, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

125 N Washington St, DeRidder, LA 70634

Elvin C Fontenot

Wills & Probate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 East Texas Street, Leesville, LA 71446

Paul C Tate

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

705 Chestnut St, Mamou, LA 70554

A Bruce Rozas

Sexual Harassment, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

1212 East St, Mamou, LA 70554

Anthony J. Hebert

Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Car Accident, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2306 Sampson Street, Westlake, LA 70669

Martha Rundell Crenshaw

Employee Rights, Family Law, Criminal, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2001 Macarthur Dr, Alexandria, LA 71301

Leo Joseph Flynn

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Employment, Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

2820 Jackson St, Alexandria, LA 71301

Katharine Geary

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

3327 Jackson St, Alexandria, LA 71301

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

PUBLIC DEFENDER

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and ar... (more...)

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and are unable to pay for their own defense.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Sugartown RICO Act Lawyer, Louisiana

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Wesley Ryan Bailey

George Higgins

Leslie R Leavoy

Elvin C Fontenot

Paul C Tate

A Bruce Rozas

Anthony J. Hebert

Martha Rundell Crenshaw

Leo Joseph Flynn

Katharine Geary

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ASSAULT

SELF-DEFENSE

JURY NULLIFICATION

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

CRIMINAL INSANITY

BURDEN OF PROOF

PUBLIC DEFENDER

SPECIFIC INTENT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details