Tacoma Criminal Lawyer, Washington, page 6

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Cristine Beckwith
About | Practice Areas
Cristine Beckwith, Attorney at Law
1115 Tacoma Ave S Tacoma, WA 98402» view map
Criminal Defense Law
An Attorney Who Never Gives Up

Cristine Beckwith is a Tacoma criminal lawyer who is dedicated to defending her clients. She is a zealous advocate and proven negotiator who will work hard for you.

253-238-8273
1. Cristine Beckwith Tacoma, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2004
  Gonzaga University J.D. 2004
2. AboutCristine Beckwith, Attorney at Law
  An Attorney Who Never Gives Up
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Derek Michael Smith

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

717 Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma, WA 98402

Nicole Lee Williams

Lawsuit & Dispute, Wrongful Termination, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

711 St Helens Ave, Tacoma, WA 98402

Mike Moceri

Traffic, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

401 Broadway, Tacoma, WA 98402

Scott Mills

Immigration, DUI-DWI, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

317 South 72nd Street, Tacoma, WA 98408

Donald William Winskill

White Collar Crime, Criminal, Civil Rights, Personal Injury

Status: Deceased

CONTACT

15 N Broadway, Tacoma, WA 98403

Paul Jeffrey Bernstein

Federal, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

1216 N J St, Tacoma, WA 98403

Nelson C Fraley

Employment Discrimination, Criminal, Civil Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

5316 Orchard St West, University Place, WA 98467

Mark Compton Wagner

Workers' Compensation, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

6512 20Th St Ct W, Tacoma, WA 98464

Douglas Wayne Tufts

Private Judging, Criminal, Insurance, Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

2518 N Adams St, Tacoma, WA 98406

Ross Dean Brittain

Criminal

Status: Deceased Licensed: 71 Years

CONTACT

17909 Bothell Way NE, Bothell, WA 98011

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Tacoma Criminal Lawyer, Washington, page 6

Sponsored Law Firm

Cristine Beckwith, Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Derek Michael Smith

Nicole Lee Williams

Mike Moceri

Scott Mills

Donald William Winskill

Paul Jeffrey Bernstein

Nelson C Fraley

Mark Compton Wagner

Douglas Wayne Tufts

Ross Dean Brittain

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SELF-DEFENSE

SENTENCE

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

HOT PURSUIT

ARREST WARRANT

PROBABLE CAUSE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details