Valley Park Criminal Lawyer, Oklahoma

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Monty Pritchett
About | Practice Areas
Pritchett Law Group
126 West Needles Avenue Bixby, OK 74008» view map
Estate Law
A Focus On Results

Don't wait! Contact us for a free phone consultation. Let us help you figure out what your next best steps are

918-509-3891
1. Monty Pritchett Bixby, OK
  Attorney at Law, OK
  University of Oklahoma College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutPritchett Law Group
  A Focus On Results
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Patrick Abitbol

Lawsuit, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

111 S Muskogee, Claremore, OK 74017

James Justin Greer

Criminal, Divorce, Family Law, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

418 W 4Th St, Claremore, OK 74017

Ernest Eugene Haynes

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

15181 Fox Run Dr, Claremore, OK 74017

Leslie A. Ellis Kissinger

Mediation, Family Law, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1750 N. Sioux, Claremore, OK 74018

Stanton Craig Harrell

Estate, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

405 W 1St St, Claremore, OK 74017

Matthew Joseph Ballard

Real Estate, Criminal, Divorce, Estate Planning

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

200 S Lynn Riggs Blvd, Claremore, OK 74017

Matthew Joseph Ballard

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

200 S Lynn Riggs Blvd, Claremore, OK 74017

Timothy J. Pickens

Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

402 East Patti Page Blvd, Claremore, OK 74017

Erinn Shaw Bisceglia

Social Security, Adoption, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

319 W 1st St, Claremore, OK 74019

Jeffrey Alan Price

Employment Discrimination, Employee Rights, Adoption, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

400 S Muskogee Ave, Claremore, OK 74017

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PUBLIC DEFENDER

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and ar... (more...)

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and are unable to pay for their own defense.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Leftwich v. Court of Criminal Appeals

Â¶ 2 The Supreme Court heard oral argument from the Petitioner, Real Party in Interest, and Amicus Curiae. Counsel for Petitioner, counsel for the Real Party in Interest, and counsel for Amicus Curiae all agreed during oral argument that certain issues raised herein were not raised, ...

Ochoa v. Bass

... Respondents. No. HC-2007-1120. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. March 12, 2008. ... hearing. We do not decide whether the trial court can or should ask such questions in any other stage of criminal proceedings prior to sentencing. ...

Nilsen v. State

... No. M-2007-285. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. February 27, 2009. ... 2 Appellant raises the following proposition of error: 1. The stop of Appellant's vehicle was not based on the reasonable suspicion that Appellant was engaged in criminal activity. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Valley Park Criminal Lawyer, Oklahoma

Sponsored Law Firm

Pritchett Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Patrick Abitbol

James Justin Greer

Ernest Eugene Haynes

Leslie A. Ellis Kissinger

Stanton Craig Harrell

Matthew Joseph Ballard

Matthew Joseph Ballard

Timothy J. Pickens

Erinn Shaw Bisceglia

Jeffrey Alan Price

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PUBLIC DEFENDER

MCNAGHTEN RULE

MISDEMEANOR

HUNG JURY

BURDEN OF PROOF

SEARCH WARRANT

LINEUP

PLEA

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Leftwich v. Court of Criminal Appeals

Ochoa v. Bass

Nilsen v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details