Weed DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Benjamin Magid
About | Practice Areas
Magid Law
112 Main Street Weaverville, CA 96093» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Experienced, Aggressive Criminal Defense

Hiring a criminal defense attorney is one of the most important decisions you will ever make. Don’t be a victim of the system. Choose Benjamin Magid as your attorney.

800-761-7580
1. Benjamin Magid Weaverville, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 2018
  Beasley School of Law J.D.
2. AboutMagid Law
  Experienced, Aggressive Criminal Defense
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Weed DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Weed lawyers.

David Illingwort Clough

Trusts, Child Custody, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

15020 Shoreline Dr, Weed, CA 96094

Barry Michael Price

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

9702 Burley Dr, Weed, CA 96094

William Withall Anderson

Divorce & Family Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

3600 Eddy Creek Rd, Weed, CA 96094

Robert David Winston

Real Estate, Government, Business, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

C. Michael Mccanta

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

6602 Hogan Dr, Weed, CA 96094

Duane Lightwater

General Practice

Status: Suspended Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

Frank Vincent Aiello

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

Roger Thomas Kosel

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

George Cushman Keeler

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 73 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

Stephen Frederick Darger

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

... liquor" in violation of the generic DUI law. (Id., 772 A.2d at pp. 1088, 1091.) The Vermont Supreme Court agreed. (Id. at p. 1091.) The court observed that "any evidence raising a doubt as to [the] defendant's condition, which is the ultimate question in a generic DWI prosecution . ...

People v. Landon

... OPINION. LAMBDEN, J.â€”. On August 14, 2008, defendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence (DUI) with a blood-alcohol level greater than 0.08 percent (Veh. Code, Â§ 23152, subd. (b)); she admitted four prior DUI 1099 convictions. ...

People v. Patel

... In exchange for a grant of probation, defendant Javid Patel entered negotiated pleas of no contest to alternative felony counts of "generic" and "per se" [1] negligent driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) that resulted in bodily injury to another, and a misdemeanor count of ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Weed DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Magid Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David Illingwort Clough

Barry Michael Price

William Withall Anderson

Robert David Winston

C. Michael Mccanta

Duane Lightwater

Frank Vincent Aiello

Roger Thomas Kosel

George Cushman Keeler

Stephen Frederick Darger

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA BARGAIN

ACTUS REUS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

SENTENCE

MOTION IN LIMINE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

People v. Landon

People v. Patel

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details