Welaka Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Joseph Gasparro
About | Practice Areas
Joseph A. Gasparro, PA
813 Jackson Rd Jacksonville, FL 32225» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients

When you need accurate representation for criminal defense issues, Joseph Gasparro is there for you.

800-971-8621
1. Joseph Gasparro Jacksonville, FL
  Attorney at Law- FL, 2015
  Florida Coastal School of Law, J.D. 2015
2. AboutJoseph A. Gasparro, PA
  Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert McHenry Fields

Civil Rights, Personal Injury, Family Law, Criminal, Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

413 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Garry Wood

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

415 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Ronald E Clark

Real Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

501 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

James P. Neshewat

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Contract

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

601 Saint Johns Ave, Palatka, FL 32177

Edward E Hedstrom

Motor Vehicle, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 59 Years

CONTACT

601 Saint Johns Ave, Palatka, FL 32177

Benjamin C Christian

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

514 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Alexander Joseph Gilewicz

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

410 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Cara Fraser

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

410 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Kenneth James Janesk

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

410 Saint Johns Ave, Palatka, FL 32177

Kevin Robert Monahan

Real Estate, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

Palatka, FL 32178

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

INFORMATION

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or ... (more...)

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or a misdemeanor. The information tells the defendant what crime he is charged with, against whom and when the offense allegedly occurred, but the prosecutor is not obliged to go into great detail. If the defendant wants more specifics, he must ask for it by way of a discovery request. Compare indictment.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Welaka Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

Joseph A. Gasparro, PA

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert McHenry Fields

Garry Wood

Ronald E Clark

James P. Neshewat

Edward E Hedstrom

Benjamin C Christian

Alexander Joseph Gilewicz

Cara Fraser

Kenneth James Janesk

Kevin Robert Monahan

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACCOMPLICE

INFORMATION

INSANITY

BURGLARY

EAVESDROPPING

MOTION IN LIMINE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

HUNG JURY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

State v. Meshell

Jackson v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details