Whiting RICO Act Lawyer, Indiana

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Eduardo Fontanez
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Eduardo Fontanez
7233 Indianapolis Blvd Hammond, IN 46324» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
Former Judge & Former Deputy Prosecutor

I hope we can resolve any issue you may need. Here at the Law Office of Eduardo Fontanez, are focused on providing high-quality service and customer satisfaction.

800-697-7560
1. Eduardo Fontanez Hammond, IN
  Attorney at Law - IN, 2002
  Indiana University J.D. 2001
2. AboutLaw Office of Eduardo Fontanez
  Former Judge & Former Deputy Prosecutor
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Whiting RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Whiting Criminal lawyers.

Kevin Chandler Smith

Real Estate, Criminal, Consumer Rights, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

9301 Calumet Ave., Munster, IN 46321

Kirk Edward Marrie

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

6950 Indianapolis Boulevard, Hammond, IN 46324

Jennifer Cantrell

Traffic, Family Law, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

7135 Indianapolis Blvd, Hammond, IN 46324

Randy Alan Godshalk

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic, Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

7127 Indianapolis Blvd., Hammond, IN 46324

Derrick Julkes

Landlord-Tenant, Criminal, Collection

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

3637 Grant Street, Gary, IN 46408

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Whiting RICO Act Lawyer, Indiana

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Eduardo Fontanez

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Kevin Chandler Smith

Kirk Edward Marrie

Jennifer Cantrell

Randy Alan Godshalk

Derrick Julkes

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

CRIMINAL CASE

CONVICTION

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

INFORMED CONSENT

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

LARCENY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

JURY

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details