Adamstown Criminal Lawyer, Pennsylvania, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Daniel McGarrigle
Testimonials | Contact Us
The McGarrigle Law Firm
1500 Walnut Street, 22nd Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102Â» view map
White Collar Crime, Criminal Appeals, DUI&DWI
Trial Experience & Zealous Advocacy

The Firmâ€™s devoted attention to your individual concerns, our vast trial experience in all types of criminal matters, and our skillful advocacy will ensure that your rights are protected.

800-934-5330
1. Daniel McGarrigle Philadelphia, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2003
  James E. Beasley School of Law - J.D.
2. TestimonialsRecent Reviews
  Hear what past clients are saying.
3. Contact UsCall or Email
  Call today for your initial free consultation.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Lauren M. Applegate

Criminal, Divorce, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

12 North 6th Street, Reading, PA 19601

Michael D. Dautrich

Education, Alcoholic Beverages, Criminal, Constitutional Law, Government

Status: Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

534 Court St, Reading, PA 19601

David R. Eshelman

Wills & Probate, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Consumer Rights, Mass Torts

Status:

CONTACT

424 Walnut Street, Reading, PA 19603

Paul S. Missan

Motor Vehicle, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

18 N 6Th St, Reading, PA 19601

Kevin Feeney

Defect and Lemon Law, Grand Jury Proceedings, Criminal, Search & Seizure Protections, Defamation & Slander

Status: Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

500 Court St, Reading, PA 19601

Eleni Dimitriou Geishauser

Family Law, Real Estate, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

535 Court St, Reading, PA 19603

Lauren Michelle Marks

Employment, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

720 Centre Avenue, Reading, PA 19601

Jaime L. Wertz

Criminal, Custody & Visitation, Civil Rights

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

501 N Park Rd, Reading, PA 19610

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... The Department suspended Licensee's operating privileges because of three criminal convictions arising from a single accident: reckless driving; failing to stop his vehicle at an accident scene where 168 death or personal injury was involved; and driving under the influence of ...

Com. v. Abraham

... 3 Abraham was charged with corruption of a minor, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 6301; indecent assault of a person less than 16 years of age, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 3126; endangering the welfare of a child, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 4304; and criminal solicitation, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 5902. ...

Com. v. Baldwin

... According to the Commonwealth, Section 9765 clearly indicates the legislature's intent that criminal defendants' sentences do not merge unless all of the elements of one offense are included within the elements of the other offense. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Adamstown Criminal Lawyer, Pennsylvania, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

The McGarrigle Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Lauren M. Applegate

Michael D. Dautrich

David R. Eshelman

Paul S. Missan

Kevin Feeney

Eleni Dimitriou Geishauser

Lauren Michelle Marks

Jaime L. Wertz

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ARRAIGNMENT

WARRANT

BURDEN OF PROOF

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

CAPITAL CASE

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

ACQUITTAL

INFORMED CONSENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Com. v. Abraham

Com. v. Baldwin

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS