Apalachicola Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Christopher Karpinski
About | Services
Law Offices of Christopher J. Karpinski
2910 Kerry Forest Pkwy D4-112 Tallahassee, FL 32309Â» view map
Criminal Defense, DWI/DUI, Misdemeanor
Over 20 Years Of Experience

Christopher puts the in the effort you need to have your legal issues solved. Christopher's experience in the field is what your looking for from your Defense Lawyer.

800-824-3731
1. Christopher Karpinski Leon County
  Attorney at Law - FL, 1994
  Florida State University, J.D. - 1994
2. AboutFlorida Lawyer
  Christopher practices law in Tallahassee and the surrounding areas.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  Christopher focuses his practice on Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Barbara Sanders

Criminal, Estate Planning, Commercial Real Estate

Status: Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

215 W 12Th St, Eastpoint, FL 32328

Donna Duncan

Criminal, Family Law, Commercial Real Estate

Status: Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

Apalachicola, FL 32329

Jay Gordon Shuler

Federal Appellate Practice, Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 93 Years

CONTACT

34 Fourth St, Apalachicola, FL 32329

Jay A Shuler

Federal Appellate Practice, Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

34 Fourth St, Apalachicola, FL 32329

Keith Robert Jewell

Real Estate, Accident & Injury, Criminal, Civil Rights, Medical Malpractice

Status: Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

732 East Pine Avenue, Eastpoint, FL 32328

Kevin Paul Steiger

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

33 Commerce St, Apalachicola, FL 32320

M. Karl Shurtliff

Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 57 Years

CONTACT

Apalachicola, FL 32329

Shannon Stallings

Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

78 Eleventh Street, Apalachicola, FL 32320

Shannon June Stallings

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

78 11Th St, Apalachicola, FL 32320

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

PUBLIC DEFENDER

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and ar... (more...)

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and are unable to pay for their own defense.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Apalachicola Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Christopher J. Karpinski

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Barbara Sanders

Donna Duncan

Jay Gordon Shuler

Jay A Shuler

Keith Robert Jewell

Kevin Paul Steiger

M. Karl Shurtliff

Shannon Stallings

Shannon June Stallings

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ARRAIGNMENT

EAVESDROPPING

FEDERAL COURT

INFORMED CONSENT

SEARCH WARRANT

CIVIL

SELF-DEFENSE

PUBLIC DEFENDER

ACCOMPLICE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

State v. Meshell

Jackson v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS