Apopka Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Matthew Schultz
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Matthew D. Schultz
495 Grand Blvd. Suite 206 Miramar Beach, FL 32550» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Over 25 Years of Experience

Mr. Schultz is an accomplished lawyer that has over twenty-five years of legal experience in accident & injury matters.

800-960-5971
1. Matthew Schultz Saint Cloud, FL
  Attorney at Law- FL, 1993
  Stetson University College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutLaw Office of Matthew D. Schultz
  Over 25 Years of Experience
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Iyada Evette Jackson

✓

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Iyada Jackson is an accident lawyer proudly serving Altamonte Springs, Florida and the neighboring communities.

CONTACT

800-805-1371

234 N. Westmonte Drive, Altamonte Springs, FL 32716

Timothy Wayne Terry

✓

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Personal Injury, Child Custody

Over 25 years of litigation experience. Fighting for you!

For more than 25 years, the office of Timothy W. Terry, Attorney at Law has provided one-on-one attention to people in Orlando and throughout central ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

801 N Magnolia Ave, Orlando, FL 32803

Jonathan Edward Rose

Federal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

1220 Douglas Avenue, Longwood, FL 32779

Mitchell I. Fried

Criminal, Bad Faith Insurance, Banking & Finance, Animal Bite

Status:

CONTACT

999 Douglas Avenue, Altamonte Springs, FL 32714

Samuel Robert Filler

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1220 Commerce Park Drive, Longwood, FL 32779

Gary Siegel

Business Organization, Contract, Criminal, Estate Planning

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

6500 U.S.Highway 17-92, Casselberry, FL 32730

Tad A. Yates

Federal Appellate Practice, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

3117 Edgewater Drive, Orlando, FL 32804

William B. Barnett

Family Law, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

1131 Symonds Avenue, Winter Park, FL 32789

Victoria Lyn Anderson

Civil Rights, Adoption, Bankruptcy, Criminal, Child Custody

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1115 E Livingston Street, Orlando, FL 32803

Robert Joseph Trimble

Farms, Child Support, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status:

CONTACT

120 East Marks Street, Orlando, FL 32803

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Apopka Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Matthew D. Schultz

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Iyada Evette Jackson

Timothy Wayne Terry

Jonathan Edward Rose

Mitchell I. Fried

Samuel Robert Filler

Gary Siegel

Tad A. Yates

William B. Barnett

Victoria Lyn Anderson

Robert Joseph Trimble

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

PROBABLE CAUSE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CRIMINAL LAW

SPECIFIC INTENT

CORPUS DELECTI

BURDEN OF PROOF

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

State v. Meshell

Jackson v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS