Bellevue Criminal Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Robert Jones
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Robert R. Jones III
2411 Emancipation Ave, Suite 202, Houston, TX 77004Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Expert Representation for Reasonable Rates

If you need representation, call me 24/7.

800-883-8760
1. Robert Jones San Antonio, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 2014
  South Texas College of Law J.D. 2011
2. AboutLaw Office of Robert R. Jones III
  Call me 24/7--Reasonable Rates
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Katie Ann Woods

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

113 W Gilbert St, Henrietta, TX 76365

Gary Allen Taylor

Criminal, Litigation

Status: Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

495 Minnetonga Trl, Wichita Falls, TX 76310

Gary A. Taylor

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

495 Minnetonga Trl, Wichita Falls, TX 76310

Tracey Lee Jennings

Criminal, Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate

Status: Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

200 E Tarrant St, Bowie, TX 76230

Lanhon Odom

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

908 Highway 59 N, Bowie, TX 76230

Stuart Crow Shelton

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

421 East Wilbarger Street, Bowie, TX 76230

Ryan Martin Streich

Juvenile Law, State Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

1530 P B Ln, Wichita Falls, TX 76302

Carey Colin Jensen

State Appellate Practice, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

Wichita Falls, TX 76307

Ricky L. Mahler

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

Wichita Falls, TX 76307

Jeffrey Lewis Eaves

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

900 8Th St, Wichita Falls, TX 76301

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

... III. Is Clewis Necessary to Address Some Widespread Criminal Justice Problem That Jackson v. Virginia Is Inadequate To Address. We agree ... review. II. A. Logic Requires a Single Standard of Sufficiency Review in Criminal Cases. I ...

In re Schulman

In re David SCHULMAN. No. AP-75,911. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 30, 2008. 404 John G. Jasuta, Austin, for Appellant. ... We filed and set this matter for consideration. II. A criminal defense attorney's duty is to zealously represent the interests of his client on appeal. ...

Laster v. State

... No. PD-1276-07. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. January 14, 2009. 515 Kim Campbell, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Kimberly Colliet Wesley, Assistant Criminal District Atty., Fort Worth, Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bellevue Criminal Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Robert R. Jones III

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Katie Ann Woods

Gary Allen Taylor

Gary A. Taylor

Tracey Lee Jennings

Lanhon Odom

Stuart Crow Shelton

Ryan Martin Streich

Carey Colin Jensen

Ricky L. Mahler

Jeffrey Lewis Eaves

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

HUNG JURY

MOTION IN LIMINE

DIRECTED VERDICT

EAVESDROPPING

MCNAGHTEN RULE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

CIVIL

HOMICIDE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

In re Schulman

Laster v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS