Blissfield Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Tricia Terry
About | Articles
Marrs & Terry, PLLC
6553 Jackson Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103Â» view map
Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal Defense, Estate
Personalized, Efficient Counsel

Marrs & Terry, PLLC have been helping individuals face a variety of legal challenges, including bankruptcy, estate planning and administration, and family law.

800-862-7221
1. Tricia Terry Ann Arbor, MI
  Attorney at Law- MI, 1999
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D.
2. AboutExperienced Michigan Lawyer
  For more information about Tricia Terry
3. Articles
  Click here to read some legal arcticles published by Tricia Terry
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Todd Michael Morgan

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Divorce, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

113 W Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

Michael M. Mcfarland

Other, Traffic, Family Law, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

113 W Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

Lowry Matthew Rains

Other, Labor Law, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

217 E Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

William Harold Walker

Divorce, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Corporate

Status:

CONTACT

160 North Winter Street, Adrian, MI 49221

Margaret M. S. Noe

Dispute Resolution, Family Law, Criminal, Collection

Status: Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

147 N Main St, Adrian, MI 49221

John D. Baker

Criminal, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

402 N Main St, Adrian, MI 49221

Rhonda K. Underwood

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

113 W Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

John T. Glaser

Other, Government, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

113 W Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

Laura J. Schaedler

Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

425 N Main St, Adrian, MI 49221

James W. Daly

Real Estate, Lawsuit, Social Security, Divorce, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

227 N Winter St, Adrian, MI 49221

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Blissfield Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Marrs & Terry, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Todd Michael Morgan

Michael M. Mcfarland

Lowry Matthew Rains

William Harold Walker

Margaret M. S. Noe

John D. Baker

Rhonda K. Underwood

John T. Glaser

Laura J. Schaedler

James W. Daly

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

PLEA

IMPRISON

SELF-DEFENSE

DIRECTED VERDICT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

SPECIFIC INTENT

JURY NULLIFICATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS