Boys Ranch Criminal Lawyer, Texas, page 6

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Stephanie Alvarado
About | Practice Areas
Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
100 N Central Expy Suite 805 Richardson, TX 75080» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Fighting Against Unjust Prosecution

Attorney Stephanie Alvarado is there for her clients when help is needed right away. Helping people charged with crimes in Texas for over 20 years.

800-988-5471
1. Stephanie Alvarado Richardson, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 1996
  Baylor University J.D. 1996
2. AboutStephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
  Over 20 Years of Experience
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Titiana D. Frausto

Family Law, Criminal, Juvenile Law

Status: Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

501 S Fillmore St, Amarillo, TX 79101

Gregory L. Phifer

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

3724 Huntington Dr, Amarillo, TX 79109

Joe Marr Wilson

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Mediation

Status: Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

905 S Fillmore St, Amarillo, TX 79101

Maria Guadalupe Lopez

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

2700 S Western St, Amarillo, TX 79109

Anna Marie Bell

Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

500 S Taylor St, Amarillo, TX 79101

R. Walton Weaver

Military & Veterans Appeals, Sex Discrimination, Felony, Non-profit

Status:

CONTACT

500 S Fillmore St, Amarillo, TX 79101

Tate J. Eldridge

Social Security, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

1716 S Polk St, Amarillo, TX 79102

William R. Taylor

Commercial Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Elder Law

Status: Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

2936 Duniven Cir, Amarillo, TX 79109

Thomas L. Lesly

Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

4715 Chisholm Trl, Amarillo, TX 79109

Adrian Castillo

Family Law, Juvenile Law, State Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

501 S Fillmore St, Amarillo, TX 79101

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

... III. Is Clewis Necessary to Address Some Widespread Criminal Justice Problem That Jackson v. Virginia Is Inadequate To Address. We agree ... review. II. A. Logic Requires a Single Standard of Sufficiency Review in Criminal Cases. I ...

In re Schulman

In re David SCHULMAN. No. AP-75,911. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 30, 2008. 404 John G. Jasuta, Austin, for Appellant. ... We filed and set this matter for consideration. II. A criminal defense attorney's duty is to zealously represent the interests of his client on appeal. ...

Laster v. State

... No. PD-1276-07. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. January 14, 2009. 515 Kim Campbell, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Kimberly Colliet Wesley, Assistant Criminal District Atty., Fort Worth, Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Boys Ranch Criminal Lawyer, Texas, page 6

Sponsored Law Firm

Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Titiana D. Frausto

Gregory L. Phifer

Joe Marr Wilson

Maria Guadalupe Lopez

Anna Marie Bell

R. Walton Weaver

Tate J. Eldridge

William R. Taylor

Thomas L. Lesly

Adrian Castillo

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

CONVICTION

JURY NULLIFICATION

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ASSAULT

ACTUS REUS

INFRACTION

CRIMINAL CASE

WARRANT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

In re Schulman

Laster v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS