Mr. Brad Reinhart, Attorney
Brad Reinhart
Litigation, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Business, General Practice
- Law Office: Law Office of Brad Reinhart LLC
- Phoenix Law Firms
- Law School: The George Washington University Law School 2000
- Status: In Good Standing
- Licensed: 23 years
602-443-5604
- Profile LAWPOINTS™29/ 100LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers - No Misconduct Found ✓
- Reviews Pro Bono Cases ✓
- Upgrade to a premium listing
- Update your listing
- LAWYERID™ GWL-000-1038LawyerID™'s identify each individual within Lawyer.com’s directory of 2M global lawyers and help to ensure that the most accurate, up-to-date records are being kept on every lawyer. If you are a practicing lawyer without a LawyerID prominently displayed on your Lawyer.com profile, please call 800-840-0600 to receive one.
Contact Us - Lawyer Brad Reinhart Avvo
introduction
QUESTIONNAIRE
Experience
Position | Organization | Location | Duration |
---|
Education
School | Degree | Major | Graduation |
---|---|---|---|
The George Washington University Law School | Law School | 2000 |
Admission
State / Court | Date |
---|---|
Arizona | 2000 |
Associations
Honors & Awards
Cases
Publications
Office Hours
Sun. | Mon. | Tue. | Wed. | Thu. | Fri. | Sat. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Verified Credentials
Lawyers with longer memberships tend to have more experience so we use the Membership date to help prioritize lawyer listings on search pages.
Verified Credentials | Date Verified |
---|
Above credentials have been verified independently by Lawyer.com.
Learn More
Legal Articles
Peer Endorsements
Additional Info
AZ State Lawyer Additional Information: More About: Mr. Brad Reinhart, Educated at George Washington, admitted to practice in 2000, admitted to the State Bar of Arizona August 4, 2000. Professional Liability Insurance: No Discipline Date: 07/16/2013 Discipline Activity: Probation Discipline Detail: Complete From Case Number: 09-0604, Charges: 3 06/24/11 Probation Bar No. 020272File Nos. 09-0604, 09-1934, 10-0494 By final judgment and order dated June 24, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court censured Brad Reinhart, Phoenix, and placed him on two years of probation. He also must pay the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceeding. Mr. Reinhart represented a criminal defendant with prior convictions who had been charged with forging a fingerprint card. Mr. Reinharts first meeting with his client lasted five minutes and took place in the courthouse hallway. During that meeting, Mr. Reinhart discussed the charges and the prosecutors plea offer. The majority of the conversation, however, pertained to the clients personal issues and that he did not want to enter into a plea agreement and be taken into custody. . Although he appeared for the pretrial conference, Mr. Reinharts client failed to appear for the scheduled trial. After a trial in absentia, Mr. Reinharts client was found guilty of forgery, a class four felony. Approximately a year and a half later, Mr. Reinharts client filed a petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court granted the petition and set aside the conviction and prison sentence. The trial court found that Mr. Reinhart failed to adequately communicate with his client, failed to schedule an appointment to discuss the case with his client, failed to schedule a settlement conference, and failed to properly perform his duties as counsel, which resulted in his client¡¯s failure to accept a favorable plea offer or appear at trial. In the disciplinary proceeding, the hearing officer found that Mr. Reinhart failed to respond to his client¡¯s inquiries, failed to maintain adequate communication, failed to spend sufficient time with his client to competently represent him, and failed to cooperate with his client¡¯s post-conviction relief counsel, which necessitated the issuance of a subpoena for Mr. Reinhart¡¯s deposition.Aggravating factors: a pattern of misconduct and substantial experience in the practice of law. Mitigating factors: absence of a prior disciplinary record, full and free disclosure to bar coun"nd cooperative attitude toward the disciplinary proceedings, character or reputation, and remorse. Mr. Reinhart violated Rule 42, Ariz. R. Sup. Ct., specifically ER 1.3, ER 1.4(a)(2), ER 1.4(a)(3), ER 1.4(a)(4), ER 1.4(b), and ER 8.4(d).");'>Case: 09-0604, Charges: 3 06/24/11 Censure Bar No. 020272File Nos. 09-0604, 09-1934, 10-0494 By final judgment and order dated June 24, 2011, the Arizona Supreme Court censured Brad Reinhart, Phoenix, and placed him on two years of probation. He also must pay the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceeding. Mr. Reinhart represented a criminal defendant with prior convictions who had been charged with forging a fingerprint card. Mr. Reinharts first meeting with his client lasted five minutes and took place in the courthouse hallway. During that meeting, Mr. Reinhart discussed the charges and the prosecutors plea offer. The majority of the conversation, however, pertained to the clients personal issues and that he did not want to enter into a plea agreement and be taken into custody. . Although he appeared for the pretrial conference, Mr. Reinharts client failed to appear for the scheduled trial. After a trial in absentia, Mr. Reinharts client was found guilty of forgery, a class four felony. Approximately a year and a half later, Mr. Reinharts client filed a petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court granted the petition and set aside the conviction and prison sentence. The trial court found that Mr. Reinhart failed to adequately communicate with his client, failed to schedule an appointment to discuss the case with his client, failed to schedule a settlement conference, and failed to properly perform his duties as counsel, which resulted in his client¡¯s failure to accept a favorable plea offer or appear at trial. In the disciplinary proceeding, the hearing officer found that Mr. Reinhart failed to respond to his client¡¯s inquiries, failed to maintain adequate communication, failed to spend sufficient time with his client to competently represent him, and failed to "perate with his client¡¯s post-convicti AZ State Lawyer Additional Information: Discipline: Probation Discipline Date: 07/16/2013 Professional Liability Insurance: No AZ State Lawyer Additional Information: Professional Liability Insurance: No
Service Type: Private
Update Date: 2021-05-27
To recommend or link to this lawyer as a trusted attorney, we have provided a list of sample links. Please choose the one that meet your needs.
Want a Premium Customized Photo Badge?
Call Toll Free: 800-620-0900
Image Link 1
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/brad-reinhart.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/2791287i.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 2
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/brad-reinhart.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/2791287p.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 3
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/brad-reinhart.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/2791287f.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 4
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/brad-reinhart.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/2791287v.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Text Link 1
<div id="Lcom" style="width:250px;text-align:center;background-color: #fbaa02;padding:3px;"><a href="http://www.lawyer.com/brad-reinhart.html" style="color: #fff;text-decoration:none;size: 12px;">Lawyer.com Listed: Brad Reinhart</a></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Change History
1001 N Central Avenue
Suite 660
Phoenix, AZ 85004