Bryn Mawr Misdemeanor Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Vincent Davis
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates
150 N. Santa Anita Ave, Suite 200 Arcadia, CA 91006» view map
Criminal Defense, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor
Advocating On Your Behalf

If you are seeking an experienced criminal defense attorney to represent you, count on the Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis.

626-446-6442
1. Vincent Davis Arcadia, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 1986
  Loyola Marymount, J.D., 1986
2. AboutLaw Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates
  Over 20 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Juvenile Dependency Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Thomas George Tears

✓

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI

In the past 45 years, I have been fighting for clients in Santa Ana and throughout Orange County, and I have earned an excellent reputation with the j... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

714-550-1101

250 N Golden Circle Dr, Santa Ana, CA 92705

Peter Francis Iocona

✓

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Felony, Misdemeanor

Rated by "Super Lawyers" - Orange County's "Best" or "Top-Rated" DUI Defense Firm

Rated by Super Lawyers, Peter F. Iocona - Attorney at Law, and his partners, Alan Castillo and Marlo Cordero, formed "The SoCal Law Network" and selec... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-976-6931

23152 Verdugo Drive, Laguna Hills, CA 92653

Karren Kenney

✓

Criminal, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime, Felony, Misdemeanor

State Bar of California

Karren Kenney was a Deputy Public Defender for almost 12 years where she became one of the best Orange County criminal defense attorneys, defending ev... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

855-505-5588

2900 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Jahzeel Osejo

Criminal, Misdemeanor

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

337 N. Vineyard Ave., Ontario, CA 91764

Alisha C Frank

Lawsuit, Divorce & Family Law, Misdemeanor, Civil & Human Rights

Status: Licensed: 13 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

160 S. Old Springs Rd., Anaheim, CA 92808

Donald G. Sowers

DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Traffic

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

7545 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92618

Matthew Blake Wallin

Education, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

17592 Irvine Blvd, Tustin, CA 92780

Mark Raymond McDonald

State Appellate Practice, White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor, Felony

Status: Licensed: 35 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

23276 South Pointe Dr., Laguna Hills, CA 92653

Jana Santiago

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony

Status: Licensed: 11 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

700 Civic Center Drive, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Keith L. Allen

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor

Status: Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

27702 Crown Valley Pkwy, Ladera Ranch, CA 92694

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

BOOKING

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed beh... (more...)

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed behind bars. Nowadays, the book is likely to be a computer. Usually, a mug shot and fingerprints are taken, and the arrestee's clothing and personal effects are inventoried and stored.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Feyrer

... Defendant Jesse Feyrer was charged with assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, an offense punishable either as a felony or a misdemeanorâ€”commonly known as a "wobbler." It also was alleged defendant personally inflicted great bodily injury upon the ...

People v. Mauch

... Code, Â§ 11358) to a misdemeanor. We agree the trial court lacked authority to reduce the offense from a felony to a misdemeanor, and we therefore vacate defendant's plea and direct the trial court to reinstate the charge as a felony. 673 I. ...

People v. Garcia

... (b).) Involuntary manslaughter based on "an unlawful act, not amounting to felony"â€”a killing resulting from the commission of a misdemeanorâ€”requires proof not only that the defendant acted with general criminal intent but also that the predicate misdemeanor was dangerous ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bryn Mawr Misdemeanor Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Thomas George Tears

Peter Francis Iocona

Karren Kenney

Jahzeel Osejo

Alisha C Frank

Donald G. Sowers

Matthew Blake Wallin

Mark Raymond McDonald

Jana Santiago

Keith L. Allen

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

SPECIFIC INTENT

CAPITAL CASE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

MENS REA

BOOKING

HUNG JURY

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Feyrer

People v. Mauch

People v. Garcia

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS