Swastika White Collar Crime Lawyer, Ontario

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Matthew Friedberg
About | Practice Areas
Caramanna, Friedberg LLP
700 Bay St 405, Box 144 Toronto, ON M5G 1Z6» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Defending Your Rights

Caramanna, Friedberg LLP provides comprehensive legal advice and vigorously protects the rights of clients facing criminal charges and regulatory offences.

416-924-5969
1. Matthew Friedberg Toronto, ON
  Attorney at Law- ON, 1995
  Osgoode Hall L S York University, LL. B. 1995
2. AboutCaramanna, Friedberg LLP
  Defending Your Rights
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Swastika White Collar Crime lawyer.
Below are all Swastika lawyers.

Robert Allan Dinnen

Business, Wills & Probate, Power of Attorney, Wills

Status:

CONTACT

4 Government Rd E, Kirkland Lake, ON P2N 1A2

Emilie Jane Chamaillard

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

6 Government Rd W, Kirkland Lake, ON P2N 2E1

Julie Sara Richard-Gorman

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

6 Government Rd W, Kirkland Lake, ON P2N 2E1

Gavin Shorrock

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

15 Government Rd E, Kirkland Lake, ON P2N 3J5

Raymond Arthur Warman

Litigation, Family Law, Wills & Probate, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

29 Government Road E, Kirkland Lake, ON P2N 3H7

Murray Nickolas Ellies

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

Kirkland Lake, ON P2N 1A1

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INFORMATION

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or ... (more...)

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or a misdemeanor. The information tells the defendant what crime he is charged with, against whom and when the offense allegedly occurred, but the prosecutor is not obliged to go into great detail. If the defendant wants more specifics, he must ask for it by way of a discovery request. Compare indictment.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Swastika White Collar Crime Lawyer, Ontario

Sponsored Law Firm

Caramanna, Friedberg LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert Allan Dinnen

Emilie Jane Chamaillard

Julie Sara Richard-Gorman

Gavin Shorrock

Raymond Arthur Warman

Murray Nickolas Ellies

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PROBABLE CAUSE

MENS REA

SEARCH WARRANT

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

JUSTICE SYSTEM

BATTERY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INFORMATION

MOTION IN LIMINE

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS