Cantonment Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Joseph Gasparro
About | Practice Areas
Joseph A. Gasparro, PA
813 Jackson Rd Jacksonville, FL 32225» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients

When you need accurate representation for criminal defense issues, Joseph Gasparro is there for you.

800-971-8621
1. Joseph Gasparro Jacksonville, FL
  Attorney at Law- FL, 2015
  Florida Coastal School of Law, J.D. 2015
2. AboutJoseph A. Gasparro, PA
  Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Russell H. Rein

Animal Bite, Criminal, Motor Vehicle, Business Organization

Status:

CONTACT

9511 Holsberry Road, Pensacola, FL 32534

Alice Faye Harris

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

2725 Sandicrest Dr, Cantonment, FL 32533

Diane Stefani

Juvenile Law, Health Care

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

3196 Stefani Rd, Cantonment, FL 32533

Randall Joseph Hensel

Criminal, Government, Federal Trial Practice, State Government

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

11593 Dueling Oaks Dr, Pensacola, FL 32514

Joel M Cohen

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody

Status: Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

2172 W Nine Mile Rd, Pensacola, FL 32534

Edward Brian Lang

Criminal, Divorce, Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

5618 Lobelia Ln, Pensacola, FL 32526

Paul John Hamlin

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

5997 Dahoon Dr, Pensacola, FL 32526

Angelia Lucille Mercer

Intellectual Property, Health Care, Criminal, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

5324 Rowe Trl, Milton, FL 32571

Richard Terry Hill

Estate, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

4938 Pattock Pl, Milton, FL 32571

Mikaela Ziko

Criminal, Government

Status:

CONTACT

11000 University Pkwy, Pensacola, FL 32514

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Cantonment Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

Joseph A. Gasparro, PA

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Russell H. Rein

Alice Faye Harris

Diane Stefani

Randall Joseph Hensel

Joel M Cohen

Edward Brian Lang

Paul John Hamlin

Angelia Lucille Mercer

Richard Terry Hill

Mikaela Ziko

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

BURDEN OF PROOF

IMPEACH

SELF-DEFENSE

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

ARREST WARRANT

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

State v. Meshell

Jackson v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS