Catalina White Collar Crime Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Catalina White Collar Crime lawyer.
Below are all Catalina Criminal lawyers.

Raul A Miranda

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

10645 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85737

Cedric Martin Hopkins

Federal Appellate Practice, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

10645 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85737

Troy A Simon

Litigation, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Federal Trial Practice

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

11000 N La Canada Dr, Tucson, AZ 85737

Larry J Lingeman

Employment Discrimination, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

9892 N Ridge Shadow Pl, Tucson, AZ 85704

Joseph K. Austin

Gaming & Alcohol, Indians & Native Populations, Criminal, Corporate

Status:

CONTACT

3386 W Crestone Ct, Tucson, AZ 85742

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

PUBLIC DEFENDER

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and ar... (more...)

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and are unable to pay for their own defense.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Catalina White Collar Crime Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Raul A Miranda

Cedric Martin Hopkins

Troy A Simon

Larry J Lingeman

Joseph K. Austin

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACQUITTAL

MENS REA

CRIMINAL INSANITY

LINEUP

INSANITY

BURDEN OF PROOF

SPECIFIC INTENT

PUBLIC DEFENDER

DIRECTED VERDICT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS