2. / /

Cherry Hill Antitrust Lawyer, New Jersey

Member Representative

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition


Member Representative

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Cherry Hill Antitrust Lawyers and Cherry Hill Antitrust Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Lawn King, Inc.

... Involved are allegations of illegal restraints of trade in the operation of a franchise business in violation of the New Jersey Antitrust Act, NJSA 56:9-1 et seq. (L.1970, c. 73). ... The provisions of the franchise contracts form the basis of most of the antitrust charges here involved. ...

Pomanowski v. MONMOUTH CTY. BD. OF RELATORS

... The principal issue is whether that arrangement constitutes a violation of the New Jersey Antitrust Act, NJSA 56:9-1 to -19, as held by the court below, Pomanowski v. Monmouth County Board of Realtors, 175 NJ Super. 212 (Ch.Div. 1980). ...

Sickles v. Cabot Corp.

... At issue in this appeal is whether an indirect purchaser of an allegedly price-fixed product may state a claim for antitrust violations under the New Jersey Antitrust Act (ATA), NJSA 56:9-1 to -19, and the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), NJSA 56:8-1 to -20. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

  • Free Consultation
  • Male
  • Female
  • Suspended

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.