Cherry Hill DUI-DWI Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

George Vahn
About | Practice Areas
Vahn Law
27 Dearborn Ave. #175 Browns Mills, NJ 08015» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Your Case Matters To Us

You have Rights; we exist to make certain those Rights are not violated and that you are afforded every opportunity to obtain a fair legal result.

800-708-3561
1. George Vahn Browns Mills, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 2005
  Rutgers University J.D. 2005
2. AboutVahn Law
  New Jersey's Legal Defense
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Christopher M Carnelli

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2091 Springdale Road, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003

Joseph J. Urban

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2091 Springdale Road, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003

Melissa L. Mignogna

Family Law, Child Support, DUI-DWI, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4 Kings Highway East, Haddonfield, NJ 08033

Keith Owen Campbell

Child Support, Criminal, Farms, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

402 Park Blvd., Cherry Hill, NJ 08002

Allen J. Littlefield

Animal Bite, DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Personal Injury, Premises Liability

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

204 White Horse Pike, Haddon Heights, NJ 08035

Arnold N Fishman

Premises Liability, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Car Accident, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

204 White Horse Pike, Haddon Heights, NJ 08035

David R. York

Animal Bite, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Motor Vehicle

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

8000 Sagemore Drive, Marlton, NJ 08053

Evan M Levow

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1415 Marlton Pike E, Cherry Hill, NJ 08034

Evan M. Levow

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

1415 Marlton Pike East, Cherry Hill, NJ 08034

Zachary Cooper

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

1415 Marlton Pike East, Cherry Hill, NJ 08034

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Ugrovics

... FUENTES, JAD. Defendant Joel M. Ugrovics was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI), NJSA 39:4-50(a). This appeal concerns the admissibility of the results of an Alcotest administered to defendant in connection with this charge. ...

State v. Tsetsekas

... LIHOTZ, JAD. Defendant Christos E. Tsetsekas appeals from his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), NJSA 39:4-50, after trial de novo in the Law Division. ... Accordingly, Trooper Rubino issued a summons charging defendant with DWI. ...

State v. Bringhurst

... We therefore affirm. I. On June 25, 1996, without representation by counsel, defendant Joseph M. Bringhurst pled guilty in Hammonton City (Hammonton) municipal court to driving while intoxicated (DWI). ... a prior guilty plea to a charge of driving while intoxicated (DWI) . . . ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Cherry Hill DUI-DWI Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

Vahn Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Christopher M Carnelli

Joseph J. Urban

Melissa L. Mignogna

Keith Owen Campbell

Allen J. Littlefield

Arnold N Fishman

David R. York

Evan M Levow

Evan M. Levow

Zachary Cooper

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

CONTINGENCY FEE

MENS REA

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

EAVESDROPPING

SELF-DEFENSE

SPECIFIC INTENT

SELF-INCRIMINATION

JURY NULLIFICATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Ugrovics

State v. Tsetsekas

State v. Bringhurst

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details