Clinton County, MI Misdemeanor Lawyers, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Akiva Goldman
About | Practice Areas
Goldman & Associates
615 Griswold St. Suite 1325 Detroit, MI 48226» view map
Probate
Over 30 Years Experience

Accessibility, responsiveness, and personal commitment is our approach to client representation.

800-797-8031
1. Akiva Goldman Detroit, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1986
  Wayne State University J.D. 1986
2. AboutGoldman & Associates
  Our firm has quick and easy access to all courts in the metro Detroit area.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Probate
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Clinton Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Clinton lawyers.

Ralph William Carmichael

Business, Corporate, Merger & Acquisition

Status: Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

924 Terminal Rd, Lansing, MI 48906

Annette E. Skinner

Social Security, Government, Children's Rights, Bankruptcy

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

1103 N Washington Ave, Lansing, MI 48906

Bradley J. Shafer

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Employee Rights, Corporate

Status: Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

3800 Capitol City Blvd, Lansing, MI 48906

Melanie L.B. Wandji

Juvenile Law, Deportation, Federal Appellate Practice, Divorce

Status: Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

13191 Schavey Rd, Dewitt, MI 48820

Charles A. Palmer

Real Estate, Art, Entertainment, Agriculture

Status: Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

15043 Classic Dr, Bath, MI 48808

Elena O. Palombo

Art, Entertainment, Administrative Law, Business

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

9707 Craun Rd, Dewitt, MI 48820

Marvin E. Robertson

Divorce & Family Law

Status: Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

1007 Hampshire Dr, Saint Johns, MI 48879

Lisa Sullivan

Estate Planning, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Children's Rights

Status: Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

100 E State St, Saint Johns, MI 48879

Matthew Joseph Hoffer

Medical Malpractice

Status:

CONTACT

3800 Capital City Blvd, Lansing, MI 48906

Patricia L. Donath

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

5150 Hawk Hollow Dr E, Bath, MI 48808

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

... And that was that. So, the People have to show that the defendant entered without permission, for the purpose of committing a misdemeanor, taking property, or committing a felony. That his body did go in, so he entered without the owner's permission. ...

People v. Sadows

... and remand for further proceedings. 96 I. In Docket No. 286689, defendant, Colleen Sadows, was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), MCL 257.625(1), a misdemeanor. Because Sadows was previously ...

People v. Reid

... SAWYER, J. This case presents the question whether the circuit court possesses the jurisdiction 160 to try a defendant on a misdemeanor charge when the accompanying felony charge was dismissed before the beginning of trial. ... Thus, only the misdemeanor charge remained. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Clinton County, MI Misdemeanor Lawyers, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

Goldman & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Ralph William Carmichael

Annette E. Skinner

Bradley J. Shafer

Melanie L.B. Wandji

Charles A. Palmer

Elena O. Palombo

Marvin E. Robertson

Lisa Sullivan

Matthew Joseph Hoffer

Patricia L. Donath

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

NOLLE PROSEQUI

VENIREMEN

MCNAGHTEN RULE

LINEUP

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SPECIFIC INTENT

SEARCH WARRANT

EXPUNGE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

People v. Sadows

People v. Reid

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 70