Colorado Springs Felony Lawyer, Colorado, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jeffrey M. Laski
About | Practice Areas
Jeffrey M. Laski
8400 E. Prentice Avenue, # 1500, Greenwood Village, CO 80111Â» view map
Assault, Battery, DUI and DWI
Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer

If you want a Colorado criminal defense attorney or a Colorado D.U.I. attorney to help you, please call me

720-270-2500
1. Jeffrey M. Laski Greenwood Village, CO
  Attorney at Law - Colorado
2. AboutJeffrey M. Laski
  My passion is helping people. I've been protecting the rights of Colorado's citizens for three decades.
3. Practice AreasServices
  I bring my wealth of experience, great personal care, and attention to each case.
1. Contact
2. E-mail
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Colorado Springs Felony lawyer.
Below are all Colorado Springs Criminal lawyers.

Matthew Phillip Schoettle

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

309 Jerry Street, Castle Rock, CO 80104

Michael Alexander Lassota

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

312 S Weber St, Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Ryan Stuart Coward

Veterans' Affairs, Other, Litigation, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

415 N Tejon St, Colorado Springs, CO 80903

William Beck

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

320 S. Nevada Avenue, Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Allen C. Gasper

Divorce & Family Law, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Traffic

Status: Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

128 South Tejon, Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Beau Andrew Worthington

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Car Accident, Employee Rights

Status: Licensed: 17 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

121 E Vermijo Avenue, Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Bryson Perkins

Criminal, Misdemeanor, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Felony

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

102 S Tejon St, Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Christian Schwaner

Juvenile Law, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 28 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

405 S. Cascade Ave., Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Christian Carl Samuelson

White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor, Felony, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

429 South Cascade Ave, Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Christian Samuelson

White Collar Crime, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

429 South Cascade Ave, Colorado Springs, CO 80903

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

BOOKING

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed beh... (more...)

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed behind bars. Nowadays, the book is likely to be a computer. Usually, a mug shot and fingerprints are taken, and the arrestee's clothing and personal effects are inventoried and stored.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Cook

... Counts one through four: sexual exploitation of children, class three felony, Â§ 18-6-403(3)(a), CRS2008. ... Count five: sexual assault on a child â€” victim less than 15 â€” pattern of abuse, class three felony, Â§ 18-3-405(1), (2)(d), CRS2008. Defendant was acquitted. ...

Roberts v. People

... The court of appeals upheld both his conviction of class-three-felony theft and his mandatorily aggravated sentence, reasoning that the evidence supported the commission of a single offense of "theft by deception," which continued, and included everything taken by Roberts ...

People v. Curren

... Opinion by Judge ROY. The prosecution appeals from an order granting defendant John Estel Curren's Crim. P. 35(c) motion which vacated his conviction on two counts of felony first degree murder, and ordered a new trial based on an actual conflict of interest of trial counsel. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Colorado Springs Felony Lawyer, Colorado, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Jeffrey M. Laski

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Matthew Phillip Schoettle

Michael Alexander Lassota

Ryan Stuart Coward

William Beck

Allen C. Gasper

Beau Andrew Worthington

Bryson Perkins

Christian Schwaner

Christian Carl Samuelson

Christian Samuelson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

SELF-INCRIMINATION

INFORMED CONSENT

CIVIL

CRIMINAL INSANITY

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

BOOKING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Cook

Roberts v. People

People v. Curren

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS