Dadeville RICO Act Lawyer, Alabama

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Dadeville RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Dadeville Criminal lawyers.

Will O. Walton

✓

Accident & Injury, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Trucking, Wrongful Death

After many years of practicing law with a large prestigious firm, Trip Walton decided to build his own firm around a core of attorneys with superior t... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-839-6251

1710 Catherine Court, Auburn, AL 36830

Walter Mark Northcutt

Criminal, Estate, DUI-DWI, Wills & Probate

Status: Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

Auburn, AL 36831

Michael Edward Short

Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

Auburn, AL 36831

Andrew Lee Maddox

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Contract

Status:

CONTACT

9 N Lafayette St, Lafayette, AL 36862

Yong Ui Gregg

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

P.O. 356, Lafayette, AL 36862

Lenae Spain Simpson

Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

2106 Gateway Dr, Opelika, AL 36801

Courtney Clanton Murchison

Divorce, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Felony

Status: Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

2106 Gateway Dr, Opelika, AL 36801

Benjamin Howard Parr

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Traffic, Civil & Human Rights

Status: Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

830 Avenue, Opelika, AL 36801

Charles Ralph Gillenwaters

Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

Alexander City, AL 35011

George Lamar Beck

Traffic, White Collar Crime, Criminal, Insurance, Credit & Debt

Status: Licensed: 60 Years

CONTACT

Alexander City, AL 35011

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Dadeville RICO Act Lawyer, Alabama

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Will O. Walton

Walter Mark Northcutt

Michael Edward Short

Andrew Lee Maddox

Yong Ui Gregg

Lenae Spain Simpson

Courtney Clanton Murchison

Benjamin Howard Parr

Charles Ralph Gillenwaters

George Lamar Beck

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CIVIL

ARREST WARRANT

MOTION IN LIMINE

JURY NULLIFICATION

DIRECTED VERDICT

JURY

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS