Danville Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Hill
About | Practice Areas
Russell & Hill, PLLC
1212 North Washington St. Suite 132 Spokane, WA 99201» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Professional, Personal, Proven

You have questions, and we have answers. Here at Russell & Hill, PLLC, we know how to obtain the most favorable outcome for your particular circumstances.

800-928-5340
1. James Hill Spokane, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2001
  Seattle University J.D. 2001
2. AboutRussell & Hill, PLLC
  Professional, Personal, Proven
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Karin Bagn

Other, Lawsuit & Dispute, Health Care, Criminal, Divorce

Status:

CONTACT

Danville, WA 99121

Pamela Reese Lamica

Federal, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

1, Kettle Falls, WA 99141

Emma J Paulsen-Thew

Federal, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

350 E Delaware Ave, Republic, WA 99166

Sheila L Corcoran

Animal Bite, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Federal

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

2643D Onion Creek Rd, Northport, WA 99157

Lorinda S. Noble

Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

964 N Jefferson, Colville, WA 99114

Torinto Marasco

Personal Injury, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

107 North Main St, Colville, WA 99114

Bruce Hanify

Other, State Appellate Practice, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

116 N Main St, Colville, WA 99114

Jill N Hogberg

Family Law, Guardianships & Conservatorships, Adoption, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

116 N Main St, Colville, WA 99114

Gerald A. Janasak

Criminal, Federal

Status: Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

672 S Wynne St, Colville, WA 99114

Melissa Annette May

Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

344 E Birch Ave, Colville, WA 99114

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Danville Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

Russell & Hill, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Karin Bagn

Pamela Reese Lamica

Emma J Paulsen-Thew

Sheila L Corcoran

Lorinda S. Noble

Torinto Marasco

Bruce Hanify

Jill N Hogberg

Gerald A. Janasak

Melissa Annette May

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

SEARCH WARRANT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CAPITAL CASE

SELF-DEFENSE

DIRECTED VERDICT

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

INTENTIONAL TORT

MENS REA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS