Davis Patent Lawyer, California

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Sponsored Law Firm


Michael Sapoznikow

Trademark, Patent, Copyright, Internet
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  20 Years

James M. Ritchey

Patent, Intellectual Property, Biotechnology
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Clifford Forrest Rey

Trademark, Patent
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  32 Years

James Harrison Salter

Trademark, Patent, Copyright, Federal
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  37 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Davis Patent Lawyers and Davis Patent Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Intellectual Property areas including Copyright, International Intellectual Property and Trademark attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Lockwood v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton

... We conclude that Lockwood's complaint arises under the patent laws of the United States and therefore is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts under section 1338 of title 28 of the United States Code (section 1338). ...

Landmark Screens, LLC v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP

... LLP. Landmark contends that its complaint for legal malpractice in patent prosecution raised no substantial issue of federal patent law and the superior court therefore erred in ruling that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We ...

City of Hope Nat. Med. Center v. Genentech

... of clerk's transcript and has generated 18 friend-of-the-court briefs, the primary issue is whether, as the jury found, a fiduciary relationship necessarily arose when City of Hope, in return for royalties, entrusted a secret scientific discovery to Genentech to develop, to patent, and to ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.