Decatur Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Lockwood
About | Practice Areas
The Lockwood Legal Group, LLC.
26418 Olympic Club Drive South Bend, IN 46628» view map
Accident & Injury, Criminal, and Divorce
Justice is blind

I represent clients like you to obtain justice on their behalf. Justice is not a commodity, it's a right.

800-457-7830
1. James Lockwood South Bend, IN
  Attorney at Law- IN, 2004
  Notre Dame Law School, J.D. 2011
2. AboutThe Lockwood Legal Group, LLC.
  Justice is blind
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Decatur Felony lawyer.
Below are all Decatur Criminal lawyers.

Michael E. Robie

Medical Products & Devices, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

58429 Hill Dr, Lawrence, MI 49064

Albert W. Laaksonen

Real Estate, Estate Planning, Criminal, Consumer Bankruptcy

Status: Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

226 1/2 E Michigan Ave, Paw Paw, MI 49079

Gary A. Stewart

Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

203 S Niles St, Paw Paw, MI 49079

Kelly L. Page

Real Estate, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

203 S Niles St, Paw Paw, MI 49079

Rudolph M. Marcelletti

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

148 N Main St, Lawton, MI 49065

Kathleen M. Brickley

Litigation, Family Law, Criminal, Collection

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

212 E Paw Paw St, Paw Paw, MI 49079

Richard K. Burnham

Criminal, Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody

Status: Licensed: 59 Years

CONTACT

303 E Paw Paw St, Paw Paw, MI 49079

Stacey Rentfrow

Family Law, Contract, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

226 1/2 E Michigan Ave, Paw Paw, MI 49079

Nichole Marie Dunfield

Landlord-Tenant, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Criminal, Misdemeanor

Status: Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

303 East Paw Paw St, Paw Paw, MI 49079

Mark D Dubay

Real Estate, Trusts, Estate, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

Paw Paw, MI 49079

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

... Opinion. MARKMAN, J. At issue here is whether convicting and sentencing a defendant for both first-degree felony murder and the predicate felony 538 violates the "multiple punishments" strand of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States and Michigan constitutions. ...

People v. Gardner

... This Court has ruled that the statutes imply that each predicate felony must arise from separate criminal incidents. ... Therefore, multiple felonies that arise from the same criminal incident or transaction count as a single felony under the habitual offender laws. ...

People v. Idziak

... In this case, we consider whether a parolee who is convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a felony committed while on parole is entitled, under Michigan's jail credit statute, MCL 769.11b, to credit for time served in jail after his arrest on the new offense and ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Decatur Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

The Lockwood Legal Group, LLC.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael E. Robie

Albert W. Laaksonen

Gary A. Stewart

Kelly L. Page

Rudolph M. Marcelletti

Kathleen M. Brickley

Richard K. Burnham

Stacey Rentfrow

Nichole Marie Dunfield

Mark D Dubay

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ARRAIGNMENT

CONTINGENCY FEE

DIRECTED VERDICT

SELF-DEFENSE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

ACCOMPLICE

JURY NULLIFICATION

HOT PURSUIT

IMPEACH

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

People v. Gardner

People v. Idziak

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS