Detroit Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 10

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Nickolas Hannawa
About | Practice Areas
Hannawa Law PC
2909 E Big Beaver Rd Troy, MI 48083» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Full-service legal experts on your side.

Whatever the specific details of your situation may be, our attorneys are ready to fight for you and guide you through every step of the process.

248-466-0770
1. Nickolas Hannawa Troy, MI
  Attorney at Law, MI
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D. 2013
2. AboutHannawa Law PC
  Full-service legal experts on your side.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Brian F. Abramson

Federal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

608 N Wayne Rd, Westland, MI 48185

Denise A Hirschmann

Farms, Child Support, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

38550 Garfield Rd, Clinton Township, MI 48038

Raymond A Cassar

Traffic, Medical Products & Devices, Federal, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

30445 Northwestern Hwy, Farmington, MI 48334

Howard S. Weingarden

Premises Liability, Alcoholic Beverages, Criminal, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

30833 Northwestern Hwy, Farmington, MI 48334

Barry A. Resnick

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Constitutional Law, Antitrust

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

30300 Northwestern Hwy, Farmington, MI 48334

Richard J. Amberg

Litigation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

24145 Locust St, Farmington, MI 48335

Walter J. Piszczatowski

Litigation, DUI-DWI, Constitutional Law, Antitrust

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

1760 S Telegraph Rd, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302

James W. Burdick

Health Care Other, Health Care, Federal, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1760 S Telegraph Rd, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302

Michael M. McNamara

Construction, Criminal, Corporate, Contract

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

41700 6 Mile Rd, Northville, MI 48168

Mark J. Mandell

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Corporate, Contract

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

41700 6 Mile Rd, Northville, MI 48168

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Detroit Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 10

Sponsored Law Firm

Hannawa Law PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Brian F. Abramson

Denise A Hirschmann

Raymond A Cassar

Howard S. Weingarden

Barry A. Resnick

Richard J. Amberg

Walter J. Piszczatowski

James W. Burdick

Michael M. McNamara

Mark J. Mandell

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ACTUS REUS

CAPITAL CASE

PROBABLE CAUSE

NOLO CONTENDERE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

INFORMED CONSENT

HABEAS CORPUS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS