Dresher Criminal Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Daniel McGarrigle
Testimonials | Contact Us
The McGarrigle Law Firm
1500 Walnut Street, 22nd Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102Â» view map
White Collar Crime, Criminal Appeals, DUI&DWI
Trial Experience & Zealous Advocacy

The Firmâ€™s devoted attention to your individual concerns, our vast trial experience in all types of criminal matters, and our skillful advocacy will ensure that your rights are protected.

800-934-5330
1. Daniel McGarrigle Philadelphia, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2003
  James E. Beasley School of Law - J.D.
2. TestimonialsRecent Reviews
  Hear what past clients are saying.
3. Contact UsCall or Email
  Call today for your initial free consultation.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Michael F. Dunn

Juvenile Law, Wills, Estate, DUI-DWI

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

162 South Easton Road, Glenside, PA 19038

Charles J. Weiss

Labor Law, Employment, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status:

CONTACT

400 Maryland Drive, Fort Washington, PA 19034

Edward A. Fox

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Real Estate, Estate

Status: Licensed: 43 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

808 Bethlehem Pike, Erdenheim, PA 19038

Richard John Lemanowicz

Real Estate, Telecommunications, Estate, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

1012 North Bethlehem Pike, Lower Gwynedd, PA 19002

Jonathan D. Consadene

Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

709 N Easton Rd, Willow Grove, PA 19090

Danielle Agnes Peters

Divorce, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

1126 B Horsham Road, Ambler, PA 19002

Francis S. Makos

Alimony & Spousal Support, Child Support, Children's Rights, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

261 Old York Rd, Jenkintown, PA 19046

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... The Department suspended Licensee's operating privileges because of three criminal convictions arising from a single accident: reckless driving; failing to stop his vehicle at an accident scene where 168 death or personal injury was involved; and driving under the influence of ...

Com. v. Abraham

... 3 Abraham was charged with corruption of a minor, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 6301; indecent assault of a person less than 16 years of age, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 3126; endangering the welfare of a child, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 4304; and criminal solicitation, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 5902. ...

Com. v. Baldwin

... According to the Commonwealth, Section 9765 clearly indicates the legislature's intent that criminal defendants' sentences do not merge unless all of the elements of one offense are included within the elements of the other offense. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Dresher Criminal Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

The McGarrigle Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael F. Dunn

Charles J. Weiss

Edward A. Fox

Richard John Lemanowicz

Jonathan D. Consadene

Danielle Agnes Peters

Francis S. Makos

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

PLEA

HABEAS CORPUS

MENS REA

PROSECUTE

ARREST WARRANT

INTENTIONAL TORT

INFORMED CONSENT

JURY NULLIFICATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Com. v. Abraham

Com. v. Baldwin

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS