Fallston Criminal Lawyer, Maryland

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Seth Price
About | Practice Areas
Price Benowitz LLP
409 7Th St Nw Suite 200 Washington, DC 20004Â» view map
Criminal Law
Working Relentlessly For You

Our firm was built on the understanding that comprehensive representation does not begin and end in the courtroom.

202-600-9400
1. Seth Price Washington, DC
  Attorney at Law- DC, 1996
  George Washington University Law School
2. AboutPrice Benowitz LLP
  Working Relentlessly for You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Charles Waechter

✓

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Felony, Internet

Bel Air Criminal Defense Law Firm If you face criminal charges, an experienced and respected defense lawyer can help protect your rights, evaluate ... (more)

CONTACT

800-655-3150

206 North Hickory Avenue, Bel Air, MD 21014

Laura L. Henninger

Traffic, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

5 South Hickory Avenue, Bel Air, MD 21014

Christopher R. vanRoden

Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Products Liability

Status:

CONTACT

206 North Hickory Avenue, Bel Air, MD 21014

Charles Edward Kearney

Farms, Child Support, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

101 Thomas Street, Lower Level, Bel Air, MD 21014

Francis J. Henninger

Traffic, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

5 South Hickory Avenue, Bel Air, MD 21014

Karen Leslie Jones

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

710 Rock Spring Rd, Bel Air, MD 21014

Edward Vincent Curry

Lawsuit & Dispute, Government, Criminal, Litigation

Status:

CONTACT

200 S Main St, Bel Air, MD 21014

Douglas A. Jones

Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

604 Rock Spring, Bel Air, MD 21014

David Earl Carey

Traffic, Litigation, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

2 S. Bond Street, Bel Air, MD 21014

Shane Patrick Nolan

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

30 E Pennsylvania Ave, Bel Air, MD 21014

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Opert v. Criminal Injuries

The Criminal Injuries Compensation law, now codified in Â§Â§ 11-801 through 11-819 of the Criminal Procedure Article (CP), was enacted in 1968 for the purpose of enabling innocent victims of certain crimes to receive State-funded compensation for physical injury sustained by them as a ...

Price v. State

... JOHN C. ELDRIDGE, Judge (Retired, Specially Assigned). In this criminal case, we granted the defendant's petition for a writ of certiorari to re-examine the Maryland common law principle that inconsistent jury verdicts are normally permissible in criminal jury trials. ...

Neal v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board

On November 4, 2004, Mr. Neal filed a Crime Victims' Compensation Application with the Board and sought to recover for medical expenses and the disability he incurred as a result of the assault. On November 30, 2004, the Board denied his claim for compensation because, it ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Fallston Criminal Lawyer, Maryland

Sponsored Law Firm

Price Benowitz LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Charles Waechter

Laura L. Henninger

Christopher R. vanRoden

Charles Edward Kearney

Francis J. Henninger

Karen Leslie Jones

Edward Vincent Curry

Douglas A. Jones

David Earl Carey

Shane Patrick Nolan

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ARREST WARRANT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

DIRECTED VERDICT

EAVESDROPPING

SELF-DEFENSE

JURY NULLIFICATION

CHARGE

ARRAIGNMENT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Opert v. Criminal Injuries

Price v. State

Neal v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS