Fountain Valley Felony Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Elliott N. Kanter
About | Practice Areas
The Law Office of Elliott N. Kanter
2445 5th Avenue Suite 350 San Diego, CA 92101» view map
Accident & Injury Law
When Experience Matters Most

San Diego attorney Elliott Kanter has served criminal defense and personal injury clients for 40 years. Get compassionate legal service.

800-641-9290
1. Elliott N. Kanter San Diego, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 1980
  Thomas Jefferson School of Law J.D.
2. AboutThe Law Office of Elliott N. Kanter
  When Experience Matters Most
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Paul Seth Meyer

✓

White Collar Crime, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Following 10 years as a senior prosecutor with the Orange County District Attorney's Office, where he supervised the Homicide Panel, Paul Meyer founde... (more)

CONTACT

714-754-6500

695 Town Center Dr, Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Jana Santiago

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony

Status: Licensed: 11 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

700 Civic Center Drive, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Randy Collins

Juvenile Law, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1000 Quail Street, Newport Beach, CA 92660

Fabian C. Serrato

Personal Injury, Civil Rights, Criminal, Felony, Immigration

Status: Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

217 N Main St, Santa Ana, CA 92701

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Chun

... II. DISCUSSION. A. The Constitutionality of the Second Degree Felony-murder Rule. ... The second degree felony-murder rule is based on statute and, accordingly, stands on firm constitutional ground. [4]. B. The Merger Doctrine and Second Degree Felony Murder. ...

People v. Albillar

... The remaining issues involve the enhancement defined by Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1) (section 186.22(b)(1)), which adds specified penalties for "any person who is convicted of a felony committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any ...

People v. Delgado

... 1063 OPINION. BAXTER, J. After a jury convicted defendant of felony offenses, a court trial was held on the allegation, for purposes of enhancing his sentence, that he had a prior serious felony conviction. ... other than a firearm." Only the latter version qualifies as a serious felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Fountain Valley Felony Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Office of Elliott N. Kanter

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Paul Seth Meyer

Jana Santiago

Randy Collins

Fabian C. Serrato

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

PROSECUTE

PLEA BARGAIN

ARREST WARRANT

DIRECTED VERDICT

WARRANT

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

PROBABLE CAUSE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Chun

People v. Albillar

People v. Delgado

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS