Franklin County, MO Discrimination Lawyers

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination

Michael Thomas Harvath Lawyer

Michael Thomas Harvath

VERIFIED *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here
Accident & Injury, Workers' Compensation, Car Accident

Mr. Harvath is an attorney licensed in both Missouri and Illinois. He has been practicing in the areas of personal injury, medical malpractice, wrongf... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

314-471-5585

Steven Paul Kuenzel

Traffic, Criminal, Corporate, Medical Malpractice
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Nicholas Chlebowski

Business, Criminal, Estate, DUI-DWI, Divorce & Family Law
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Colleen Marie Kuenzel

Workers' Compensation, Family Law, Corporate, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Kevin Albert Richardson

Estate Planning, Family Law, Corporate, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  22 Years

Ryan J. Helfrich

Landlord-Tenant, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  19 Years

Rodney Wayne Mckinney

Criminal, DUI-DWI
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Daniel M. Buescher

Elder Law, Adoption, Estate Planning, Traffic
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

William W. Eckelkamp

Real Estate, Health Care, Civil & Human Rights, Corporate, Motor Vehicle
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

James W. Mcgettigan

Construction, Family Law, Collection, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Missouri Discrimination Lawyers and Missouri Discrimination Law Firms for your location. Narrow your Discrimination attorney search for Missouri by major city or a specific Missouri city using the city list. Or search for Missouri Discrimination attorneys by county. For more attorneys, search all Civil & Human Rights areas including Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Elder Law and Native People attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Hill v. Ford Motor Co.

... nonmovant. Id. III. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS UNDER THE MHRA. A. The Missouri Human Rights Act, Not Federal Case Law, Provides the Framework for Analyzing Discrimination and Retaliation Claims. The ...

Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc.

... appeals the judgment of the trial court in the amount of $10,390.42 in favor of Dean Stanley. Mr. Stanley sued the company under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA) for age discrimination. ... Mr. Stanley subsequently sued JerDen Foods for age discrimination. ...

Kesler-Ferguson v. Hy-Vee, Inc.

... its strike; (2) it misapplied the standard for finding that Hy-Vee's strike was racially motivated; (3) it improperly placed the burden of persuasion on Hy-Vee by requiring Hy-Vee to justify its strike with a race-neutral explanation; and (4) Kesler did not prove invidious discrimination. ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.