Friars Point Criminal Lawyer, Mississippi, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Joseph Murphy
About | Practice Areas
Smith, Murphy & Dobbs, LLC
1109 Van Buren Ave Oxford, MS 38655» view map
Accident & Injury and Criminal Defense
Smart, Efficient, Precise

Fair legal work for fair compensation. We are straight-forward in our communications with clients and return all emails and phone calls within twenty-four (24) hours.

800-894-6061
1. Joseph Murphy Oxford, MS
  Attorney at Law- MS, 2013
  University of Mississippi School of Law, J.D. 2013
2. AboutSmith, Murphy & Dobbs, LLC
  Smart, Efficient, Precise
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Benjamin Murphy

Estate Planning, Family Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

2565 Caffey St., Hernando, MS 38632

Gerald W Chatham

Criminal, Estate Planning, Family Law, Litigation

Status: Licensed: 57 Years

CONTACT

291 Losher St, Hernando, MS 38632

James W. Amos

Family Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2430 Caffey Street, Hernando, MS 38632

Angela M Jones

Criminal, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

365 Losher St, Hernando, MS 38632

Mary Lynn Damare

Criminal, Estate Planning, Family Law, Litigation

Status: Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

4903 Henry Drive, Southaven, MS 38672

Louis Collins Walker

DUI-DWI, Felony, Estate

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

5699 Getwell Road, Southaven, MS 38672

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Coleman v. State

... 4. Coleman is only partially correct. Trotter does state that a criminal defendant who pleads guilty may challenge the sentence that results from the guilty plea on direct appeal, even though he or she may not challenge the conviction that results from a guilty plea. ...

Burrough v. State

... that night outside Bill Ashmore's Wrecker Service establishment by a deputy from the Grenada County Sheriff's Office who had been notified by the Mississippi Highway Patrol that two of its patrolmen had detained Burrough at that location on suspicion of criminal activity at the ...

Jordan v. State

... doubt. See, eg, Miller v. State, 980 So.2d 927, 929 (Miss.2008) (noting that the burden of proof for criminal cases is proof beyond a reasonable doubt). A. Identification of the Shooter and the Motion for Directed Verdict. Â¶ 24. Jordan ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Friars Point Criminal Lawyer, Mississippi, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Smith, Murphy & Dobbs, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Benjamin Murphy

Gerald W Chatham

James W. Amos

Angela M Jones

Mary Lynn Damare

Louis Collins Walker

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CIVIL

CAPITAL CASE

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

CRIMINAL INSANITY

ARRAIGNMENT

HUNG JURY

DIRECTED VERDICT

BURGLARY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Coleman v. State

Burrough v. State

Jordan v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS