Haslet Criminal Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Bruce Kaye
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices Of Bruce C. Kaye
400 N. St. Paul St.1110 Dallas, TX 75201» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Changing Lives, One Case At A Time

The best thing about running my own practice is the opportunity to give my clients the individual attention they deserve.

800-920-9461
1. Bruce Kaye Dallas, TX
  Attorney at Law- TX,
  South Texas College of Law, J.D. 1992
2. AboutLaw Offices Of Bruce C. Kaye
  Changing lives, one case at a time.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Doug Weathers

Juvenile Law, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

9500 Ray White Rd., Keller, TX 76244

Todd A. Durden

Wills, Family Law, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status:

CONTACT

131 E Vine St, Keller, TX 76248

David Brenton Murphree

Military, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

337 W Main St, Azle, TX 76020

Robert Bradley Prince

Personal Injury, Bankruptcy, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

305 Fossil Bridge Dr, Aledo, TX 76131

Todd A. Durden

Estate Planning, Family Law, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

5750 Rufe Snow Drive, North Richland Hills, TX 76180

Rodney Lee Dangler

Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

5204 Navato Pl, Aledo, TX 76244

Milton E. Haberer

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

1429 Riverside Rd, Argyle, TX 76262

Robin Velvet Grounds

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

1221 Newcastle St, Argyle, TX 76262

Richard Charles Kline

Family Law, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

5755 Rufe Snow Dr, North Richland Hills, TX 76180

John Edwin Shannon

Tax, International, Environmental Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

5616 Desert Willow Ct., Fort Worth, TX 76137

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

... III. Is Clewis Necessary to Address Some Widespread Criminal Justice Problem That Jackson v. Virginia Is Inadequate To Address. We agree ... review. II. A. Logic Requires a Single Standard of Sufficiency Review in Criminal Cases. I ...

In re Schulman

In re David SCHULMAN. No. AP-75,911. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 30, 2008. 404 John G. Jasuta, Austin, for Appellant. ... We filed and set this matter for consideration. II. A criminal defense attorney's duty is to zealously represent the interests of his client on appeal. ...

Laster v. State

... No. PD-1276-07. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. January 14, 2009. 515 Kim Campbell, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Kimberly Colliet Wesley, Assistant Criminal District Atty., Fort Worth, Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Haslet Criminal Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices Of Bruce C. Kaye

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Doug Weathers

Todd A. Durden

David Brenton Murphree

Robert Bradley Prince

Todd A. Durden

Rodney Lee Dangler

Milton E. Haberer

Robin Velvet Grounds

Richard Charles Kline

John Edwin Shannon

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MOTION IN LIMINE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

LARCENY

HUNG JURY

ACQUITTAL

BURDEN OF PROOF

SELF-DEFENSE

INFORMED CONSENT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

In re Schulman

Laster v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS