Haw River Criminal Lawyer, North Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Thomas Roupas
About | Practice Areas
Roupas Law Firm PLLC
119 North Greene Street, Suite 100 Greensboro, NC 27401» view map
Criminal Defense
Get The Support You Need For Your Case

If you are charged with a crime, you need an experienced criminal defense attorney to represent you and protect your rights.

800-658-8911
1. Thomas Roupas Greensboro, NC
  Attorney at Law - NC, 1997
  UF Levin COL, JD, 1997
2. AboutRoupas Law Firm PLLC
  Roupas Law Firm, PLLC provides legal services at a great value.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Testimonials
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

John Cox

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Child Support, Traffic, Juvenile Law

Growing up as the son of a Marine Corps Aviator and a public school teacher, John W. Cox saw firsthand how his parents dedicated their lives to helpin... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-659-5540

114-D South Maple Street, Graham, NC 27253

Todd Allen Smith

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Personal Injury

As a fixture in State and Federal Courts across North Carolina since 1999, Todd Smith has dedicated his practice to helping regular people faced with ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

336-222-7735

110 South Maple Street, Graham, NC 27253

H. Clay Hemric

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Traffic, Workers' Compensation

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

114 South Maple St., Graham, NC 27253

Ricky W. Champion

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

114 South Maple St., Graham, NC 27253

Barry T. Winston

Courts-Martial & Discharge, Employment, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

312 W. Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516

David R. Huffman

Transportation & Shipping, Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

103 W Elm St, Graham, NC 27253

Robert D. Craig

Divorce, Criminal, Insurance, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4 Ne Court Square, Graham, NC 27253

Robert Clyde Giles

Civil & Human Rights, Criminal, Employment Discrimination, Personal Injury, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

110 South Maple Street, Graham, NC 27253

Andrew H. Hanford

Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

212 W. Elm Street, Graham, NC 27253

Jocelyn Calvin Wright

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

212 W. Elm Street, Graham, NC 27253

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Bare

... 1st. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law; and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action. 2d. ... A. Legislative Intent. Whether a statutory scheme is civil or criminal is first of all a question of statutory construction. ...

Dogwood Dev. & Mgmt. v. White Oak Transport

... For instance, plain error review is available in criminal appeals, Odom, 307 NC at 660, 300 SE2d at 378, for challenges to jury instructions and evidentiary issues, State v. Cummings, 352 NC 600, 613, 536 SE2d 36, 47 (2000), cert. denied, 532 US 997, 121 S.Ct. ...

State v. Styles

... Under Terry and subsequent cases, a traffic stop is permitted if the officer has a "reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot." Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 US 119, 123, 120 S.Ct. 673, 675, 145 L.Ed.2d 570, 576 (2000). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Haw River Criminal Lawyer, North Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

Roupas Law Firm PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

John Cox

Todd Allen Smith

H. Clay Hemric

Ricky W. Champion

Barry T. Winston

David R. Huffman

Robert D. Craig

Robert Clyde Giles

Andrew H. Hanford

Jocelyn Calvin Wright

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

ACQUITTAL

EAVESDROPPING

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

CRIME

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SELF-DEFENSE

INFORMED CONSENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Bare

Dogwood Dev. & Mgmt. v. White Oak Transport

State v. Styles

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details