Helen Criminal Lawyer, West Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Claude S. Smith, III
About | Practice Areas
The Law Offices of Claude S. Smith III
805 Bigley Avenue Charleston, WV 25302» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Working With Clients One On One

As your attorney, I will make sure you know that I am here for you. I will keep you updated on your case as it progresses.

800-936-8471
1. Claude S. Smith, III Charleston, WV
  Attorney at Law - WV, 1992
  University of Houston J.D. 1989
2. AboutThe Law Offices of Claude S. Smith III
  Working With Clients One On One
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Kevin J. Robinson

Litigation, Criminal, Civil Rights, Insurance

Status:

CONTACT

600 Neville Street, Beckley, WV 25801

C. Scott Applegate

Personal Injury, Insurance, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

600 Neville Street, Beckley, WV 25801

J. Mingo Winters

Bad Faith, DUI-DWI, Collection, Consumer Bankruptcy

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

102 McCreery Street, Beckley, WV 25801

G Todd Houck

Child Custody, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

Mullens, WV 25882

William M. Lester

Constitutional Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

214 Prosperity Rd, Beckley, WV 25802

Derrick Ward Lefler

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Lawsuit & Dispute

Status: Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

1607 Honaker Ave., Princeton, WV 24740

Gerald R. Linkous

Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

1460 E Main St, Princeton, WV 24740

Phillip B. Ball

Real Estate, Estate, Accident & Injury, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

1421 Princeton Ave, Princeton, WV 24740

Derrick Ward Lefler

Accident & Injury, Health Care, Criminal, Motor Vehicle, Real Estate

Status: Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

x, Princeton, WV 24740

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Booth

... Third, the probation officer's recommended sentence was further bolstered by Mr. Booth's prior criminal record. ... Mr. Booth's young age and the extensive criminal history he had already accumulated within that time worked against him. ...

Lowe v. Cicchirillo

... After completing his review of the appellee's medical records, Deputy Fleming filed a criminal complaint with the Harrison County Magistrate Court. Shortly thereafter, a warrant was issued for the appellee's arrest for the crime of driving under the influence. ...

Peters v. Rivers Edge Min., Inc.

... following additional factors: (1) The costs of the litigation; (2) Any criminal sanctions imposed on the defendant for his conduct; (3) Any other civil actions against the same defendant, based on the same conduct; and. (4) The ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Helen Criminal Lawyer, West Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Claude S. Smith III

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Kevin J. Robinson

C. Scott Applegate

J. Mingo Winters

G Todd Houck

William M. Lester

Derrick Ward Lefler

Gerald R. Linkous

Phillip B. Ball

Derrick Ward Lefler

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

PLEA

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

ACTUS REUS

MOTION IN LIMINE

INFORMED CONSENT

SPECIFIC INTENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Booth

Lowe v. Cicchirillo

Peters v. Rivers Edge Min., Inc.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS