Helendale Felony Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Vincent Davis
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates
150 N. Santa Anita Ave, Suite 200 Arcadia, CA 91006» view map
Criminal Defense, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor
Advocating On Your Behalf

If you are seeking an experienced criminal defense attorney to represent you, count on the Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis.

626-446-6442
1. Vincent Davis Arcadia, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 1986
  Loyola Marymount, J.D., 1986
2. AboutLaw Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates
  Over 20 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Juvenile Dependency Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Helendale Felony lawyer.
Below are all Helendale Criminal lawyers.

Benjamin Echols

Criminal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

530 Barstow Road, Barstow, CA 92311

Brandon Arthur Wood

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

14338 Park Ave, Victorville, CA 92392

Stephen Clark Peretz

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

15215 Mandan Rd, Apple Valley, CA 92307

Robert Bruce Daly

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

10250 Rancho Rd, Adelanto, CA 92301

Timothy Edward Nunn

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Apple Valley, CA 92307

Brian Skibby

Defense Contracts, DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

14338 Park Avenue, Victorville, CA 92392

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Chun

... II. DISCUSSION. A. The Constitutionality of the Second Degree Felony-murder Rule. ... The second degree felony-murder rule is based on statute and, accordingly, stands on firm constitutional ground. [4]. B. The Merger Doctrine and Second Degree Felony Murder. ...

People v. Albillar

... The remaining issues involve the enhancement defined by Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1) (section 186.22(b)(1)), which adds specified penalties for "any person who is convicted of a felony committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any ...

People v. Delgado

... 1063 OPINION. BAXTER, J. After a jury convicted defendant of felony offenses, a court trial was held on the allegation, for purposes of enhancing his sentence, that he had a prior serious felony conviction. ... other than a firearm." Only the latter version qualifies as a serious felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Helendale Felony Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Benjamin Echols

Brandon Arthur Wood

Stephen Clark Peretz

Robert Bruce Daly

Timothy Edward Nunn

Brian Skibby

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

WARRANT

EXPUNGE

CRIME

HABEAS CORPUS

FEDERAL COURT

ARREST WARRANT

INTENTIONAL TORT

ACQUITTAL

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Chun

People v. Albillar

People v. Delgado

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS