Hinkley Felony Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

J. Jeffrey Morris
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of J. Jeffrey Morris
11845 West Olympic Boulevard Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90064» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Difficult Cases and Clients Are Welcome

J. Jeffrey Morris is an experienced attorney who has been practicing law in California since 1987.

800-781-3531
1. J. Jeffrey Morris Los Angeles, CA
  Attorney at Law- CA, 1986
  Loyola Law School, J.D. 1986
2. AboutLaw Office of J. Jeffrey Morris
  Difficult Cases and Clients Are Welcome
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Hinkley Felony lawyer.
Below are all Hinkley Criminal lawyers.

Benjamin Echols

Criminal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

530 Barstow Road, Barstow, CA 92311

Timothy Edward Nunn

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

Apple Valley, CA 92307

Robert Bruce Daly

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

10250 Rancho Rd, Adelanto, CA 92301

Stephen Clark Peretz

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

15215 Mandan Rd, Apple Valley, CA 92307

Brandon Arthur Wood

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

14338 Park Ave, Victorville, CA 92392

Brian Skibby

Defense Contracts, DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

14338 Park Avenue, Victorville, CA 92392

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Chun

... II. DISCUSSION. A. The Constitutionality of the Second Degree Felony-murder Rule. ... The second degree felony-murder rule is based on statute and, accordingly, stands on firm constitutional ground. [4]. B. The Merger Doctrine and Second Degree Felony Murder. ...

People v. Albillar

... The remaining issues involve the enhancement defined by Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1) (section 186.22(b)(1)), which adds specified penalties for "any person who is convicted of a felony committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any ...

People v. Delgado

... 1063 OPINION. BAXTER, J. After a jury convicted defendant of felony offenses, a court trial was held on the allegation, for purposes of enhancing his sentence, that he had a prior serious felony conviction. ... other than a firearm." Only the latter version qualifies as a serious felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Hinkley Felony Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of J. Jeffrey Morris

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Benjamin Echols

Timothy Edward Nunn

Robert Bruce Daly

Stephen Clark Peretz

Brandon Arthur Wood

Brian Skibby

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

PROSECUTE

PROSECUTOR

CRIMINAL INSANITY

ASSAULT

PLEA

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

PLEA BARGAIN

FEDERAL COURT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Chun

People v. Albillar

People v. Delgado

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS