Hornbrook Juvenile Law Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Benjamin Magid
About | Practice Areas
Magid Law
112 Main Street Weaverville, CA 96093» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Experienced, Aggressive Criminal Defense

Hiring a criminal defense attorney is one of the most important decisions you will ever make. Don’t be a victim of the system. Choose Benjamin Magid as your attorney.

800-761-7580
1. Benjamin Magid Weaverville, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 2018
  Beasley School of Law J.D.
2. AboutMagid Law
  Experienced, Aggressive Criminal Defense
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Hornbrook Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Hornbrook lawyers.

Lisa Ann Frost

Landlord-Tenant, Litigation, Immigration, Car Accident

Status: Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

Hornbrook, CA 96044

Charles David Slote

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

Hornbrook, CA 96044

Ryan Zane Walker

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

11832 Ager Beswick Rd, Montague, CA 96064

Robert Zane Walker

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 57 Years

CONTACT

11834 Ager Beswick Road, Montague, CA 96064

Eric Bergstrom

Traffic, Wills & Probate, Criminal, Civil Rights, Bankruptcy

Status: Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

303 South St, Yreka, CA 96097

Frank James Demarco

International Arbitration, Public Law, Environmental Law, Civil & Human Rights

Status: Licensed: 58 Years

CONTACT

192 Humbug Rd, Yreka, CA 96097

William Patrick Stanley

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

201 S Gold St, Yreka, CA 96097

Margaret Mullin Weems

White Collar Crime, Constitutional Law, Antitrust, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

320 S Oregon St, Yreka, CA 96097

Robert Bicego

Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury, Administrative Law, Government, Mass Torts

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

201 4th Street, Yreka, CA 96097

Ryan Brandon Mannix

Other, Mediation, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

500 4Th St, Yreka, CA 96097

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

BAIL BOND

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear... (more...)

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear for a court hearing, the judge can issue a warrant for his arrest and threaten to 'forfeit,' or keep, the money if the defendant doesn't appear soon. Usually, the bondsman will look for the defendant and bring him back, forcefully if necessary, in order to avoid losing the bail money.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Nguyen

... Jonathan Laba; Maureen Pacheco; Marsha Levick; Neha Desai; and Jessica Feierman for Pacific Juvenile Defender Center, Juvenile Law Center, Juvenile Division of the Los Angeles Public Defender, Alternate Public Defender, National Center for Youth Law and Youth Law ...

In re SB

164 Cal.App.4th 289 (2008). In re SB, a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL B., Defendant and Appellant. No. D052202. ...

In re Alexis E.

171 Cal.App.4th 438 (2009). In re ALEXIS E. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. ... In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, Â§ 300 et seq.), [1] Patrick E., father of three dependent minor children (Father), appeals from a judgment of the juvenile court. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Hornbrook Juvenile Law Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Magid Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Lisa Ann Frost

Charles David Slote

Ryan Zane Walker

Robert Zane Walker

Eric Bergstrom

Frank James Demarco

William Patrick Stanley

Margaret Mullin Weems

Robert Bicego

Ryan Brandon Mannix

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

EAVESDROPPING

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

ACCOMPLICE

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

MOTION IN LIMINE

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

BAIL BOND

DIRECTED VERDICT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Nguyen

In re SB

In re Alexis E.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS