Houlka Criminal Lawyer, Mississippi

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Joseph Murphy
About | Practice Areas
Smith, Murphy & Dobbs, LLC
1109 Van Buren Ave Oxford, MS 38655» view map
Accident & Injury and Criminal Defense
Smart, Efficient, Precise

Fair legal work for fair compensation. We are straight-forward in our communications with clients and return all emails and phone calls within twenty-four (24) hours.

800-894-6061
1. Joseph Murphy Oxford, MS
  Attorney at Law- MS, 2013
  University of Mississippi School of Law, J.D. 2013
2. AboutSmith, Murphy & Dobbs, LLC
  Smart, Efficient, Precise
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Brent McBride

✓

Criminal, Estate, Divorce & Family Law

W Brent McBride is a practicing lawyer in the state of Mississippi.

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-971-6540

211 N Madison St, Tupelo, MS 38802

Robert W. Davis

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Divorce

Status:

CONTACT

542 Jefferson St., Tupelo, MS 38804

Gene Barton

Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt, Divorce & Family Law

Status: Licensed: 48 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

102 N Church Street, Okolona, MS 38860

J Wayne Doss

Construction, Litigation, Criminal, Reinsurance

Status:

CONTACT

Tupelo, MS 38802

Sylvia Savini Owen

Criminal, Estate, Traffic

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

311 Magazine St, Tupelo, MS 38802

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Coleman v. State

... 4. Coleman is only partially correct. Trotter does state that a criminal defendant who pleads guilty may challenge the sentence that results from the guilty plea on direct appeal, even though he or she may not challenge the conviction that results from a guilty plea. ...

Burrough v. State

... that night outside Bill Ashmore's Wrecker Service establishment by a deputy from the Grenada County Sheriff's Office who had been notified by the Mississippi Highway Patrol that two of its patrolmen had detained Burrough at that location on suspicion of criminal activity at the ...

Jordan v. State

... doubt. See, eg, Miller v. State, 980 So.2d 927, 929 (Miss.2008) (noting that the burden of proof for criminal cases is proof beyond a reasonable doubt). A. Identification of the Shooter and the Motion for Directed Verdict. Â¶ 24. Jordan ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Houlka Criminal Lawyer, Mississippi

Sponsored Law Firm

Smith, Murphy & Dobbs, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Brent McBride

Robert W. Davis

Gene Barton

J Wayne Doss

Sylvia Savini Owen

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

HUNG JURY

SPECIFIC INTENT

BURDEN OF PROOF

BATTERY

PLEA

EXPUNGE

MOTION IN LIMINE

INTENTIONAL TORT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Coleman v. State

Burrough v. State

Jordan v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS