Irvington DUI-DWI Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Francis Crotty
About | Practice Areas
Francis P. Crotty Esq.
103 Sterling Dr Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417» view map
Criminal Defense
Experience You Can Trust

Let Francis P. Crotty Esq. handle all of your criminal defense legal matters today.

201-294-6462
1. Francis Crotty Franklin Lakes, NJ
  Attorney at Law- NJ
  Fordham University School of Law, J.D. 1975
2. AboutFrancis P. Crotty Esq.
  Experience You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert Douglas Kuttner

✓

Accident & Injury, Workers' Compensation, Car Accident, DUI-DWI, Wrongful Death

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

973-467-8300

2168 Millburn Avenue, Maplewood, NJ 07040

Gwendolyn O. Austin

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

17 Academy St., Newark, NJ 07102

Robert J. Pansulla

Corporate, DUI-DWI, Land Use & Zoning, Litigation

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

524 Union Avenue, Belleville, NJ 07109

Anthony F. Malanga

DUI-DWI, Landlord-Tenant, Legal Malpractice, Litigation

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

524 Union Avenue, Belleville, NJ 07109

Mark M. Cheser

Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

2424 Morris Avenue, Union, NJ 07083

Lawrence Michael Berezin

Workers' Compensation, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice

Status:

CONTACT

17 Academy Street, Newark, NJ 07102

Nace Naumoski

Entertainment, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights

Status:

CONTACT

618 Newark Avenue, Elizabeth, NJ 07208

Anthony Palumbo

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

190 North Avenue E., Cranford, NJ 07016

Danny T. Matrafajlo

Traffic, Workers' Compensation, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Mass Torts

Status:

CONTACT

1207 E Grand St, Elizabeth, NJ 07201

Edward P Busichio

Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

29 Alden Street, Cranford, NJ 07016

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

FELONY

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases... (more...)

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases, by death. For example, murder, extortion and kidnapping are felonies; a minor fist fight is usually charged as a misdemeanor, and a speeding ticket is generally an infraction.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Ugrovics

... FUENTES, JAD. Defendant Joel M. Ugrovics was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI), NJSA 39:4-50(a). This appeal concerns the admissibility of the results of an Alcotest administered to defendant in connection with this charge. ...

State v. Tsetsekas

... LIHOTZ, JAD. Defendant Christos E. Tsetsekas appeals from his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), NJSA 39:4-50, after trial de novo in the Law Division. ... Accordingly, Trooper Rubino issued a summons charging defendant with DWI. ...

State v. Bringhurst

... We therefore affirm. I. On June 25, 1996, without representation by counsel, defendant Joseph M. Bringhurst pled guilty in Hammonton City (Hammonton) municipal court to driving while intoxicated (DWI). ... a prior guilty plea to a charge of driving while intoxicated (DWI) . . . ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Irvington DUI-DWI Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

Francis P. Crotty Esq.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert Douglas Kuttner

Gwendolyn O. Austin

Robert J. Pansulla

Anthony F. Malanga

Mark M. Cheser

Lawrence Michael Berezin

Nace Naumoski

Anthony Palumbo

Danny T. Matrafajlo

Edward P Busichio

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

FEDERAL COURT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

NOLLE PROSEQUI

MOTION IN LIMINE

FELONY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Ugrovics

State v. Tsetsekas

State v. Bringhurst

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS