Kimberton Antitrust Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition

Javier Gonzalez De Mendoza

Commercial Real Estate, Litigation, Gift Taxation, Antitrust
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  48 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Kimberton Antitrust Lawyers and Kimberton Antitrust Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Shuman v. Bernie's Drug Con.

... practices. Because of the inherently pernicious nature of price-fixing agreements, they have been declared invalid both at common law [3] and illegal per se under the federal antitrust laws. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Mays, 401 Pa. ...

Chemical Tank Lines, Inc. v. PA. PUC

... Although the commission does not have jurisdiction to determine whether a proposed application is in violation of antitrust laws, it may consider the policy of the antitrust laws in determining the issue of 627 public convenience and necessity and the issue of competition. ...

Philco Corp. v. Sunstein

... After extensive discovery by all parties concerned, and after settlement negotiations collapsed, Sunstein commenced an antitrust action in the federal courts alleging that "Philco and RCA individually and with others" unlawfully conspired to prevent him from exploiting inventions ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.