2. / /

Lacrosse Consumer Protection Lawyer, Washington

Member Representative

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: Warranties, Recreational Products

  SPONSORED LAWYERS

1-1 of 1 matches. Page 1 of 1  

Richard James Ducharme

General Practice
Status:  Inactive *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  61 Years
CONTACT
110 River Ranch Ln, Dayton, WA 99328
Profile LAWPOINTS™22/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers

Member Representative

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Lacrosse Consumer Protection Lawyers and Lacrosse Consumer Protection Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Consumer Rights areas including Identity Theft attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McKee v. AT & T CORP.

... 3 After his individual attempts to resolve his billing issues with AT & T failed, McKee filed this class action lawsuit, alleging violations of Washington's Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW, and Washington's 849 usury statute, chapter 19.52 RCW, as well as negligence ...

Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy

... Michael sued Bright Now and Dr. Mosquera-Lacy for Consumer Protection Act (CPA) violations. The trial court dismissed the complaint on summary judgment. ... "[L]earned professions are not exempt from application of the Consumer Protection Act." Quimby v. Fine, 45 Wash. ...

Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Washington

... MADSEN, J. ¶ 1 These consolidated cases present the issue whether the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW, applies to a collection agency's allegedly deceptive efforts to collect on an insurance company's subrogation claim against an underinsured motorist. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

  • Free Consultation
  • Male
  • Female
  • Suspended

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

© 2025 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.