Little Elm Criminal Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Andrew Howard
About | Practice Areas
Andrew V. Howard, PC
1717 Mckinney Ave Suite 700 Dallas, TX 75202» view map
Criminal
Experience You Can Trust

Attorney Andrew Howard is dedicated to protecting the rights of his clients and will stop at nothing to ensure they are treated fairly in court.

214-226-1848
1. Andrew Howard Dallas, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 1995
  Regent University J.D. 1995
2. AboutAndrew V. Howard, PC
  Defending clients since 1995.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert R. Cole

Bankruptcy, Business, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 74 Years

CONTACT

1155 Point Vista Rd, Denton, TX 76205

Nike Ladapo

Business & Trade, Elder Law, Juvenile Law, Family Law, Wills

Status: Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

6160 Warren Parkway, Frisco, TX 75034

Ervette Moore Sims

Elder Law, Criminal, Family Law, Wills, Juvenile Law

Status: Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

3245 Main St, Frisco, TX 75034

Wesley William Desmond

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

2770 Main St, Frisco, TX 75033

Paul Gomez

Personal Injury, Criminal, Family Law, Litigation

Status: Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

2770 Main Street, Frisco, TX 75033

John Patrick Walsh

Business & Trade, Criminal, Intellectual Property, Litigation

Status: Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

2770 Main St, Frisco, TX 75033

Irene Melissa Maldonado

International Other, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

2770 Main St, Frisco, TX 75033

Philip David Ray

Juvenile Law, Government, , Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

2770 Main St, Frisco, TX 75033

Ted Lucas Smith

Personal Injury, Business, Criminal, Public Finance, Construction

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

9474 Homestead Ln, Frisco, TX 75033

Rosalia Boullon Maddock

Criminal, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

2024 Chaffee Rd, Frisco, TX 75036

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

... III. Is Clewis Necessary to Address Some Widespread Criminal Justice Problem That Jackson v. Virginia Is Inadequate To Address. We agree ... review. II. A. Logic Requires a Single Standard of Sufficiency Review in Criminal Cases. I ...

In re Schulman

In re David SCHULMAN. No. AP-75,911. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 30, 2008. 404 John G. Jasuta, Austin, for Appellant. ... We filed and set this matter for consideration. II. A criminal defense attorney's duty is to zealously represent the interests of his client on appeal. ...

Laster v. State

... No. PD-1276-07. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. January 14, 2009. 515 Kim Campbell, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Kimberly Colliet Wesley, Assistant Criminal District Atty., Fort Worth, Jeffrey L. Van Horn, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Little Elm Criminal Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Andrew V. Howard, PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert R. Cole

Nike Ladapo

Ervette Moore Sims

Wesley William Desmond

Paul Gomez

John Patrick Walsh

Irene Melissa Maldonado

Philip David Ray

Ted Lucas Smith

Rosalia Boullon Maddock

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

NOLLE PROSEQUI

INFORMED CONSENT

FEDERAL COURT

CRIMINAL INSANITY

CHARGE

GRAND JURY

SELF-DEFENSE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Brooks v. State

In re Schulman

Laster v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS