Live Oak Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Joseph Gasparro
About | Practice Areas
Joseph A. Gasparro, PA
813 Jackson Rd Jacksonville, FL 32225» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients

When you need accurate representation for criminal defense issues, Joseph Gasparro is there for you.

800-971-8621
1. Joseph Gasparro Jacksonville, FL
  Attorney at Law- FL, 2015
  Florida Coastal School of Law, J.D. 2015
2. AboutJoseph A. Gasparro, PA
  Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jeffrey Alan Siegmeister

Administrative Law, Government, Criminal, Animal Bite

Status: Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Live Oak, FL 32064

Elizabeth Ann Rosado

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Family Law, Commercial Real Estate

Status: Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

100 Court St Se, Live Oak, FL 32064

Richard Zasada

Divorce & Family Law, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Traffic

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

123 E. Howard St., Live Oak, FL 32064

Lucas Alan Taylor

Litigation, Family Law, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status:

CONTACT

108 Howard St W, Live Oak, FL 32064

Frederick John Schutte

Criminal, Traffic, Motor Vehicle

Status: Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

Live Oak, FL 32064

Ryan Jennings Peters

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

110 Parshley St Sw, Live Oak, FL 32064

Lee Ira Peters

Civil Rights, Federal Trial Practice, Criminal, State Government

Status: Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

110 Parshley St Sw, Live Oak, FL 32064

Kyle McLeod

Traffic, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

115 Ohio Ave S, Live Oak, FL 32064

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

BAIL BOND

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear... (more...)

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear for a court hearing, the judge can issue a warrant for his arrest and threaten to 'forfeit,' or keep, the money if the defendant doesn't appear soon. Usually, the bondsman will look for the defendant and bring him back, forcefully if necessary, in order to avoid losing the bail money.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Live Oak Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

Joseph A. Gasparro, PA

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jeffrey Alan Siegmeister

Elizabeth Ann Rosado

Richard Zasada

Lucas Alan Taylor

Frederick John Schutte

Ryan Jennings Peters

Lee Ira Peters

Kyle McLeod

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

BAIL BOND

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

PLEA BARGAIN

ARREST

HUNG JURY

SELF-DEFENSE

GRAND JURY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

State v. Meshell

Jackson v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS