Lowell Antitrust Lawyer, Wisconsin

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition

David Edwin Jones

Intellectual Property, Patent, Litigation, Antitrust
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  29 Years

Jack W. Van Metre

Antitrust, Litigation, Products Liability
Status:  Inactive *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  64 Years

Thomas R. Detmer

Intellectual Property, Antitrust, Business & Trade, Litigation
Status:  Inactive *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  49 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Lowell Antitrust Lawyers and Lowell Antitrust Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Milwaukee Braves, Inc.

... Because of such history we do not deem 717 the relevant decisions the type of construction of the meaning of the federal statute which ought to apply to our own. 2. The power of the state to apply its antitrust law in this instance. ...

Grams v. Boss

... AHS argued in Reese that it was exempt from the Wisconsin antitrust act as a sec. 182.032, Stats., organization. ... We have repeatedly stated that sec. 133.01, Stats., was intended as a reenactment of the first two sections of the federal Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, 15 USC secs. ...

Olstad v. Microsoft Corporation

... An amicus curiae brief was filed by Gerald Thain, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, and James May, Washington College of Law/American University of Law School, Washington, DC, on behalf of the American Antitrust Institute. ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.