Marianna Consumer Protection Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: Warranties, Recreational Products

Joyce Novotny-Prettiman

Living Wills, Consumer Protection, Collection, Animal Bite, Education
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  25 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Marianna Consumer Protection Lawyers and Marianna Consumer Protection Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Consumer Rights areas including Identity Theft attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ross v. Foremost Ins. Co.

... 6 On January 20, 2005, Ross filed a complaint against Foremost and Sentry alleging negligence and violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection law ("UTPCPL"), [1] which was later amended on March 15, 2005. Pleadings and discovery were exchanged. ...

Barr v. Community College of Beaver County

... Pa.CS §§ 2161-70, informally known as "Act 120." Plaintiffs' first amended complaint alleges breach of contract and breach of warranty, and that the College engaged in various unfair or deceptive acts as defined in the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (CPL ...

Bayne v. Smith

... Id. ¶ 9 In Monumental Properties the specific question was "whether the Consumer Protection Law requires a landlord to notify 269 a tenant in a lease of the tenant's statutory rights, because allegedly the absence of this notification is misleading or confusing to the tenant as [a ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.