Maupin Antitrust Lawyer, Oregon

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Maupin Antitrust Lawyers and Maupin Antitrust Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Willamette Dental Group v. OREGON DENTAL

... Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment for defendant Oregon Dental Service on their antitrust and tort claims against ODS. ... "the consistent holdings of Federal courts are that `most favored nation' clauses are not anti-competitive and are not in violation of antitrust laws.". ...

Golden West Insulation v. STARDUST INV.

... Defendant Stardust makes numerous contentions: that the franchise agreement with plaintiff was illegal and unenforceable because it violated both Oregon and federal antitrust laws; that the franchise agreement violated California franchise investment law; that the trial court ...

HAROLD BUTLER ENTER.# 97, INC. v. Vanlandingham

... Defendant filed a plea in abatement asking that the instant case be abated on the grounds that he had filed an antitrust action in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon against Denny's Restaurants, Inc., and Harold Butler Enterprises #97, Inc., the plaintiff herein ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.